Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), and Sugarcane Smut (Ustilago scitaminea Sydow) the Infection Process, Screening for Resistance, Disease Resistance and Possible Resistance Mechanisms

The interaction between sugarcane and sugarcane smut has been studied for over 130 years, yet we have not fully understand the complete defense mechanisms used by sugarcane plants against the fungus. This article outlines a brief history of sugarcane, sugarcane smut –an overview-, the infection process, some assessment methods for resistance, resistance of sugarcane to smut and there are proposed resistance mechanisms that might be operating at each stage of the colonization of the fungus in the sugarcane plant. The results based on what research has shown, indicate that there is preform and induce resistance operating in the sugarcane-Ustilago scitaminea system, both structural and chemical. It is determined that the resistance of sugarcane-to-sugarcane smut is multifactorial and the b pathogen elicits non-specific responses. The 5 step proposed resistance mechanisms involves (a) the role of morphological structure of the bud as it impedes smut spore germination or possibly delay the infection process, (b) the mechanisms used to impede or prevent spore germination on the bud surface, possibly involve diffused substances both preformed and induced. The induced substances being known phytoalexins, (c) the response mechanisms in the sugarcane bud to prevent the establishment of fungal mycelia-hypersensitive response, phytoalexins (phenolics) accumulation, lignification –induced responses, (d) the prevention of mycelia growth in the stalk-Gels and tyloses, glucanases and peroxidases, oxidative burst and savaging, callose deposition, (e) the resistance that might be operating to prevent smut whip formation-antitoxins, hormones, peroxide vessels, oxidative burst and scavenging, callose deposition and possibly papillae. In this overview there is the use Ustilago scitaminea to represent sugarcane smut although Sporisorium scitamineum is mentioned in some of references.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36347/sajb.2025.v13i03.002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), and Sugarcane Smut (Ustilago scitaminea Sydow) the Infection Process, Screening for Resistance, Disease Resistance and Possible Resistance Mechanisms

Earl A. Sealy
1 citations
Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
1.75
article

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), and Sugarcane Smut (Ustilago scitaminea Sydow) the Infection Process, Screening for Resistance, Disease Resistance and Possible Resistance Mechanisms

Earl A. Sealy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The interaction between sugarcane and sugarcane smut has been studied for over 130 years, yet we have not fully understand the complete defense mechanisms used by sugarcane plants against the fungus. This article outlines a brief history of sugarcane, sugarcane smut –an overview-, the infection process, some assessment methods for resistance, resistance of sugarcane to smut and there are proposed resistance mechanisms that might be operating at each stage of the colonization of the fungus in the sugarcane plant. The results based on what research has shown, indicate that there is preform and induce resistance operating in the sugarcane-Ustilago scitaminea system, both structural and chemical. It is determined that the resistance of sugarcane-to-sugarcane smut is multifactorial and the b pathogen elicits non-specific responses. The 5 step proposed resistance mechanisms involves (a) the role of morphological structure of the bud as it impedes smut spore germination or possibly delay the infection process, (b) the mechanisms used to impede or prevent spore germination on the bud surface, possibly involve diffused substances both preformed and induced. The induced substances being known phytoalexins, (c) the response mechanisms in the sugarcane bud to prevent the establishment of fungal mycelia-hypersensitive response, phytoalexins (phenolics) accumulation, lignification –induced responses, (d) the prevention of mycelia growth in the stalk-Gels and tyloses, glucanases and peroxidases, oxidative burst and savaging, callose deposition, (e) the resistance that might be operating to prevent smut whip formation-antitoxins, hormones, peroxide vessels, oxidative burst and scavenging, callose deposition and possibly papillae. In this overview there is the use Ustilago scitaminea to represent sugarcane smut although Sporisorium scitamineum is mentioned in some of references.

Scholars Academic Journal of BiosciencesVol. 13(03)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), and Sugarcane Smut (Ustilago scitaminea Sydow) the Infection Process, Screening for Resistance, Disease Resistance and Possible Resistance Mechanisms — Earl A. Sealy · Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS