Optimizing filtration properties of water-based drilling fluids: Performance of PAC variants and synergistic effects

Effective fluid loss control and mud cake optimization are critical for preventing drilling challenges such as pressure imbalances and pipe sticking in water-based drilling operations. While polyanionic cellulose (PAC) is a common additive for managing filtration properties, the comparative performance of its variants—PAC-R, PAC-L, and PAC-UL—remains inadequately studied. This experimental investigation evaluates these PAC variants and xanthan gum (as a benchmark) across a range of concentrations to determine the most effective option and optimal concentration for minimizing fluid loss, mud cake thickness, and permeability under Low Temperature Low Pressure (LTLP) conditions. The study further explores the potential of combining PAC-L and PAC-R to enhance filtration performance. Results indicate that each additive exhibits peak performance at specific concentrations, with 0.7 wt% frequently emerging as the optimal threshold for balancing fluid loss control and mud cake properties. Notably, the PAC-L and PAC-R combination at 0.7 wt% outperforms individual additives, achieving superior filtration characteristics through synergistic effects. These findings highlight the distinct capabilities of PAC variants and underscore the value of tailored additive combinations in optimizing drilling fluid formulations. By identifying effective strategies for filtration control, this study provides practical insights for improving drilling efficiency, enhancing wellbore stability, and supporting sustainable drilling practices, contributing significantly to the advancement of water-based drilling fluid technology. Comparison of the fluid loss of individual components and a combination, versus concentration • Impact of Polyanionic Cellulose Variants on the Filtration Properties of Muds. • PAC-R/PAC-L combination was found to be the best additive, as it showed low fluid loss. • PAC-L, which performed similarly, was the second-best individual additive. • Xanthan gum and PAC-UL were less effective at improving filtration properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.136590
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing filtration properties of water-based drilling fluids: Performance of PAC variants and synergistic effects

Hossein Hamidi, Rachida Saadi, David Wilkinson
11 citations
Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
Drilling and Well Engineering
12.60
article

Optimizing filtration properties of water-based drilling fluids: Performance of PAC variants and synergistic effects

Hossein Hamidi, Rachida Saadi, David Wilkinson
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Effective fluid loss control and mud cake optimization are critical for preventing drilling challenges such as pressure imbalances and pipe sticking in water-based drilling operations. While polyanionic cellulose (PAC) is a common additive for managing filtration properties, the comparative performance of its variants—PAC-R, PAC-L, and PAC-UL—remains inadequately studied. This experimental investigation evaluates these PAC variants and xanthan gum (as a benchmark) across a range of concentrations to determine the most effective option and optimal concentration for minimizing fluid loss, mud cake thickness, and permeability under Low Temperature Low Pressure (LTLP) conditions. The study further explores the potential of combining PAC-L and PAC-R to enhance filtration performance. Results indicate that each additive exhibits peak performance at specific concentrations, with 0.7 wt% frequently emerging as the optimal threshold for balancing fluid loss control and mud cake properties. Notably, the PAC-L and PAC-R combination at 0.7 wt% outperforms individual additives, achieving superior filtration characteristics through synergistic effects. These findings highlight the distinct capabilities of PAC variants and underscore the value of tailored additive combinations in optimizing drilling fluid formulations. By identifying effective strategies for filtration control, this study provides practical insights for improving drilling efficiency, enhancing wellbore stability, and supporting sustainable drilling practices, contributing significantly to the advancement of water-based drilling fluid technology. Comparison of the fluid loss of individual components and a combination, versus concentration • Impact of Polyanionic Cellulose Variants on the Filtration Properties of Muds. • PAC-R/PAC-L combination was found to be the best additive, as it showed low fluid loss. • PAC-L, which performed similarly, was the second-best individual additive. • Xanthan gum and PAC-UL were less effective at improving filtration properties.

Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering AspectsVol. 715
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Drilling and Well Engineering
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.