Capitalizing on risk: How corporate financial flexibility, investment efficiency, and institutional ownership shape risk-taking dynamics

In this study, we test the influence of financial flexibility [FF] on corporate risk-taking [RT], a crucial aspect of firm strategy and performance. In the volatile financial landscape of emerging markets like China, understanding how FF affects risk behavior is essential. Using data from 3571 Chinese listed firms spanning 2014 to 2023, we address this gap by exploring how FF impacts RT and the moderating roles of investment efficiency [INE] and institutional ownership [INO]. Our study employs dynamic panel generalized method of moments [GMM] and a new bias-corrected method of moments to offer robust insights. We find a significant positive correlation between FF and RT. Additionally, IE and INO significantly moderate this relationship, with RT notably amplified when FF exceeds industry- and year-adjusted averages. Interestingly, during exceptional periods, such as the COVID-19 crisis, the impact of FF on RT becomes insignificant. This study offers novel insights into the role of FF, IO and INE in risk management and provides valuable policy recommendations for stakeholders navigating high-risk investments. • Financial flexibility significantly boosts risk-taking behavior. • Investment efficiency moderates the impact of financial flexibility on risk. • Institutional ownership adjusts the effect of financial flexibility on risk. • Greater financial flexibility drives significant increases in risk-taking. • COVID-19 dampens the risk-taking driven by financial flexibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104068
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capitalizing on risk: How corporate financial flexibility, investment efficiency, and institutional ownership shape risk-taking dynamics

Mirza Muhammad Naseer, Tanveer Bagh, Collins Gyakari Ntim, Ahmed Imran Hunjra
7 citations
International Review of Economics & Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
27.37
article

Capitalizing on risk: How corporate financial flexibility, investment efficiency, and institutional ownership shape risk-taking dynamics

Mirza Muhammad Naseer, Tanveer Bagh, Collins Gyakari Ntim, Ahmed Imran Hunjra
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In this study, we test the influence of financial flexibility [FF] on corporate risk-taking [RT], a crucial aspect of firm strategy and performance. In the volatile financial landscape of emerging markets like China, understanding how FF affects risk behavior is essential. Using data from 3571 Chinese listed firms spanning 2014 to 2023, we address this gap by exploring how FF impacts RT and the moderating roles of investment efficiency [INE] and institutional ownership [INO]. Our study employs dynamic panel generalized method of moments [GMM] and a new bias-corrected method of moments to offer robust insights. We find a significant positive correlation between FF and RT. Additionally, IE and INO significantly moderate this relationship, with RT notably amplified when FF exceeds industry- and year-adjusted averages. Interestingly, during exceptional periods, such as the COVID-19 crisis, the impact of FF on RT becomes insignificant. This study offers novel insights into the role of FF, IO and INE in risk management and provides valuable policy recommendations for stakeholders navigating high-risk investments. • Financial flexibility significantly boosts risk-taking behavior. • Investment efficiency moderates the impact of financial flexibility on risk. • Institutional ownership adjusts the effect of financial flexibility on risk. • Greater financial flexibility drives significant increases in risk-taking. • COVID-19 dampens the risk-taking driven by financial flexibility.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 99
Central University of Finance and Economics (CN), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), IPAG Business School (FR), Taylor's University (MY), ILMA University (PK), University of Southampton (GB), University for Development Studies (GH), Teesside University (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Corporate Finance and Governance
27.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.