Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals

During disasters, emergency management and health agencies are typically the key providers of healthcare services, yet communication breakdowns between the two sectors often hinder response. This qualitative study explores the experiences of emergency managers and health professionals to identify challenges in cross-agency collaboration. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from New Zealand and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Inductive thematic analysis revealed three key challenges: structural, operational, and information exchange barriers. Weak interpersonal relationships and lack of prior liaison were found to impede information sharing, reducing situational awareness. Coordination was further undermined by inadequate training, insufficient funding, and reliance on untrained personnel. Rigid planning structures, limited community engagement, and the exclusion of vulnerable groups also weakened response efforts. Overly complex reporting structures and fragmented information systems restricted effective data sharing, with privacy concerns further constraining access to critical information. Interoperability challenges further disrupt the seamless flow of information across disaster response agencies. Finally, the absence of robust auditing and accountability mechanisms highlighted the need for reinforced governance frameworks and institutionalised performance evaluations to enhance disaster resilience and response effectiveness. Identifying barriers to effective communication and information sharing among key disaster response stakeholders provides valuable insights for refining emergency response strategies including the development of clear protocols, improved data integration, and the adoption of AI and digital tools to streamline reporting and enhance decision-making. These enhancements can lead to improved quality of care, faster recovery, and more efficient resource allocation during disasters, ultimately benefiting affected populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105393
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
63.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals

Todd Q. Miller, Reem Abbas
15 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Disaster Management and Resilience
63.02
article

Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals

Todd Q. Miller, Reem Abbas
article en
15 citations

Abstract

During disasters, emergency management and health agencies are typically the key providers of healthcare services, yet communication breakdowns between the two sectors often hinder response. This qualitative study explores the experiences of emergency managers and health professionals to identify challenges in cross-agency collaboration. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from New Zealand and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Inductive thematic analysis revealed three key challenges: structural, operational, and information exchange barriers. Weak interpersonal relationships and lack of prior liaison were found to impede information sharing, reducing situational awareness. Coordination was further undermined by inadequate training, insufficient funding, and reliance on untrained personnel. Rigid planning structures, limited community engagement, and the exclusion of vulnerable groups also weakened response efforts. Overly complex reporting structures and fragmented information systems restricted effective data sharing, with privacy concerns further constraining access to critical information. Interoperability challenges further disrupt the seamless flow of information across disaster response agencies. Finally, the absence of robust auditing and accountability mechanisms highlighted the need for reinforced governance frameworks and institutionalised performance evaluations to enhance disaster resilience and response effectiveness. Identifying barriers to effective communication and information sharing among key disaster response stakeholders provides valuable insights for refining emergency response strategies including the development of clear protocols, improved data integration, and the adoption of AI and digital tools to streamline reporting and enhance decision-making. These enhancements can lead to improved quality of care, faster recovery, and more efficient resource allocation during disasters, ultimately benefiting affected populations.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 120
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Disaster Management and Resilience
63.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.