Differential Processing of Sucrose and Invert Syrup in Honey Bees

Feeding bees carbohydrates, as a substitute for nectar, has become essential in modern beekeeping. We compared the effects of 65% sucrose (SS) and 65% invert sugar (IS) syrups on the survival and enzyme activity of caged honey bees. Specifically, we analyzed glycosidase activity in the head and midgut of the bees and compared the composition of sucrose-based (SH) and invert sugar-based (IH) "honey" stored by the bees and collected from the comb. Glycosidase activity was similar in head in contrast to midgut where it was higher in IS fed bees, which appeared to be residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Fructose to glucose ratio in SH were 60.84/39.16 and a presence of some other sugars were detected, while ratio in IH were 48.49/51.51, almost exactly the same as in start fed (IS) (48.57/51.43). It has been demonstrated that glycosidase activity in IH was residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Zymogram detected α-amylase band in SH, in contrast to IH, which suggest that honey bees do not add amylase into IS. In contrast to SH, no crystallization occurred in IH. SS and IS densities were 1.23 and 1.24 g/mL, respectively, increasing to 1.35 g/mL in SH and 1.28 g/mL in IH after processing. This suggests that higher humidity and restricted cleansing flight make it harder for bees to remove excess water from IH, leading to increased midgut and hindgut weight, which correlates with higher mortality in the third week for the IS-fed group and fourth week for the SS-fed group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.70052
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Processing of Sucrose and Invert Syrup in Honey Bees

Miroslava Vujčić, Zoran Vujčić, Marinela Šokarda Slavić, Biljana Dojnov et al.
5 citations
Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology
Plant and animal studies
15.13
article

Differential Processing of Sucrose and Invert Syrup in Honey Bees

Miroslava Vujčić, Zoran Vujčić, Marinela Šokarda Slavić, Biljana Dojnov, Marina Ristović, Sanja Stojanović, Ratko Pavlović
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Feeding bees carbohydrates, as a substitute for nectar, has become essential in modern beekeeping. We compared the effects of 65% sucrose (SS) and 65% invert sugar (IS) syrups on the survival and enzyme activity of caged honey bees. Specifically, we analyzed glycosidase activity in the head and midgut of the bees and compared the composition of sucrose-based (SH) and invert sugar-based (IH) "honey" stored by the bees and collected from the comb. Glycosidase activity was similar in head in contrast to midgut where it was higher in IS fed bees, which appeared to be residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Fructose to glucose ratio in SH were 60.84/39.16 and a presence of some other sugars were detected, while ratio in IH were 48.49/51.51, almost exactly the same as in start fed (IS) (48.57/51.43). It has been demonstrated that glycosidase activity in IH was residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Zymogram detected α-amylase band in SH, in contrast to IH, which suggest that honey bees do not add amylase into IS. In contrast to SH, no crystallization occurred in IH. SS and IS densities were 1.23 and 1.24 g/mL, respectively, increasing to 1.35 g/mL in SH and 1.28 g/mL in IH after processing. This suggests that higher humidity and restricted cleansing flight make it harder for bees to remove excess water from IH, leading to increased midgut and hindgut weight, which correlates with higher mortality in the third week for the IS-fed group and fourth week for the SS-fed group.

Archives of Insect Biochemistry and PhysiologyVol. 118(3)
University of Belgrade (RS), Institute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Plant and animal studies
15.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.