Development and Early Validation of A Survey Instrument for Measuring Patient Engagement in Pain Management

Efforts to improve patient engagement in pain management are often hindered by inconsistent definitions and measurements. To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested the 15-item Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey. A systematic review of 77 survey instruments identified 6 key constructs of patient engagement, and semi-structured interviews with 36 patients and 3 providers from the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program informed its development. The initial 33-item survey was refined to 15 items, and usability and test-retest reliability were evaluated with 60 Personalized Pain Program patients. The median completion time was 3.5 minutes, with minimal missing data (<0.5%). Most respondents (96-100%) found the questions relevant, with higher average scores for patient-provider communication (3.6-4.5 on a 5-point scale) and lower scores for adherence challenges. Although the Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey demonstrated good usability and applicability, further studies are needed to enhance its test-retest reliability and psychometric validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Medical Quality
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jmq.0000000000000236
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Early Validation of A Survey Instrument for Measuring Patient Engagement in Pain Management

Traci J. Speed, Anping Xie, Eileen M. McDonald, Ronen Shechter et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Development and Early Validation of A Survey Instrument for Measuring Patient Engagement in Pain Management

Traci J. Speed, Anping Xie, Eileen M. McDonald, Ronen Shechter, Olivia Sutton, Yea‐Jen Hsu, Marie N. Hanna, Jill A. Marsteller, Amro Khasawneh, Ariana Prinzbach, Samuel Kim, Ima Samba
article en

Abstract

Efforts to improve patient engagement in pain management are often hindered by inconsistent definitions and measurements. To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested the 15-item Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey. A systematic review of 77 survey instruments identified 6 key constructs of patient engagement, and semi-structured interviews with 36 patients and 3 providers from the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program informed its development. The initial 33-item survey was refined to 15 items, and usability and test-retest reliability were evaluated with 60 Personalized Pain Program patients. The median completion time was 3.5 minutes, with minimal missing data (<0.5%). Most respondents (96-100%) found the questions relevant, with higher average scores for patient-provider communication (3.6-4.5 on a 5-point scale) and lower scores for adherence challenges. Although the Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey demonstrated good usability and applicability, further studies are needed to enhance its test-retest reliability and psychometric validation.

American Journal of Medical QualityVol. 40(4)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Mercer University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.