Calculated Objective Response Rate (ORR) of 97% from Post-Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2 Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of VP-315, an Investigational therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)

Introduction Objective response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of patients achieving a complete or partial response to treatment, is a critical endpoint in clinical trials assessing the efficacy of new therapies in solid tumors, including BCC. We performed a post-hoc analysis exploring ORR as a potential primary endpoint for future studies evaluating the efficacy of VP-315, an intratumorally injected, chemotherapeutic oncolytic peptide. Objective To evaluate the effect of various VP-315 8 mg dosing regimens on antitumor response in subjects with BCC. Methods Eighty-two subjects with up to 2 target BCC tumors (total 91 tumors) were treated intratumorally with VP-315 for up to 2 weeks. Cohort 3 was not enrolled based on results from Cohorts 1-2. Each 7-day treatment week was comprised of 2 or 3 consecutive treatment days followed by a no-treatment period of at least 4 days. Dosing scheme: Cohort 1: (n=6) Tumor injected 3 days consecutively (3X/week 4 mg loading dose Day 1 followed by 8 mg dose). Cohort 2: (n=3) Tumor injected 3 days consecutively (3X/week 8 mg dose). Cohort 4: (n=36) Each tumor was injected 2 days consecutively (2X/week 8 mg split dose*). Cohort 5: (n=37) Each tumor was injected 3 days consecutively (3X/week 8 mg split dose*). * Dose split into 2 injections, 30% injected initially; 70% injected 15-30 minutes later. Post-hoc evaluation by ORR was based on response defined a priori as absence of disease progression and ≥30% reduction in lesion size from baseline, or complete resolution of ulceration in all target lesions. Complete response was based upon objective response with no residual BCC on post-treatment excisional biopsy. Partial response was objective response with presence of residual BCC. Results Eighty-two subjects (n=91 tumors) treated with VP-315 had a calculated ORR of 97%. Response rates were: 52% complete response and 45% partial response. No TRSAEs were reported. TRAEs were mostly mild to moderate. Conclusion These results support further investigation of ORR as a reliable endpoint for VP-315 in future BCC studies. Additional research using VP-315 as a potential non-surgical immunotherapy for BCC as a first line therapy in a primary or neoadjuvant setting is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.10.supp.565
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calculated Objective Response Rate (ORR) of 97% from Post-Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2 Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of VP-315, an Investigational therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)

Gary Goldenberg, S P Cutler, Thomas F. Haws, Cynthia J. Willson et al.
1 citations
SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
1.35
article

Calculated Objective Response Rate (ORR) of 97% from Post-Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2 Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of VP-315, an Investigational therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)

Gary Goldenberg, S P Cutler, Thomas F. Haws, Cynthia J. Willson, Kenneth Yee Tsai, Lawrence Green, Pamela Rumney, Jonathan Kantor, Jonathan Weiss, Neal Bhatia, David K. Glover, Jayson Rieger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Objective response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of patients achieving a complete or partial response to treatment, is a critical endpoint in clinical trials assessing the efficacy of new therapies in solid tumors, including BCC. We performed a post-hoc analysis exploring ORR as a potential primary endpoint for future studies evaluating the efficacy of VP-315, an intratumorally injected, chemotherapeutic oncolytic peptide. Objective To evaluate the effect of various VP-315 8 mg dosing regimens on antitumor response in subjects with BCC. Methods Eighty-two subjects with up to 2 target BCC tumors (total 91 tumors) were treated intratumorally with VP-315 for up to 2 weeks. Cohort 3 was not enrolled based on results from Cohorts 1-2. Each 7-day treatment week was comprised of 2 or 3 consecutive treatment days followed by a no-treatment period of at least 4 days. Dosing scheme: Cohort 1: (n=6) Tumor injected 3 days consecutively (3X/week 4 mg loading dose Day 1 followed by 8 mg dose). Cohort 2: (n=3) Tumor injected 3 days consecutively (3X/week 8 mg dose). Cohort 4: (n=36) Each tumor was injected 2 days consecutively (2X/week 8 mg split dose*). Cohort 5: (n=37) Each tumor was injected 3 days consecutively (3X/week 8 mg split dose*). * Dose split into 2 injections, 30% injected initially; 70% injected 15-30 minutes later. Post-hoc evaluation by ORR was based on response defined a priori as absence of disease progression and ≥30% reduction in lesion size from baseline, or complete resolution of ulceration in all target lesions. Complete response was based upon objective response with no residual BCC on post-treatment excisional biopsy. Partial response was objective response with presence of residual BCC. Results Eighty-two subjects (n=91 tumors) treated with VP-315 had a calculated ORR of 97%. Response rates were: 52% complete response and 45% partial response. No TRSAEs were reported. TRAEs were mostly mild to moderate. Conclusion These results support further investigation of ORR as a reliable endpoint for VP-315 in future BCC studies. Additional research using VP-315 as a potential non-surgical immunotherapy for BCC as a first line therapy in a primary or neoadjuvant setting is warranted.

SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous MedicineVol. 9(2)
George Washington University (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Capital Group (United States) (US), Florida Center for Dermatology (US), Therapeutics Clinical Research (US), Gwinnett Dermatology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.