Validity and reliability of a novel impulse-based method to analyse human striking performance

We investigated the criterion validity and within- and between-day reliability of a novel method for human striking performance assessment. The Impulse Block Method allows the measurement and calculation of a range of striking variables using a load cell incorporating an impact absorption block and laser gate timer. To assess the criterion validity, we performed repeated drop tests and compared the relationship and agreement between predicted and measured velocity and initial momentum (calculated from impulse) with predicted values using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, 10 healthy adults performed palm strikes against the Impulse Block on two occasions, and within- and between-day reliability was calculated for impulse, initial momentum, velocity, effective mass, kinetic energy, and power. There was a strong linear relationship and high agreement between measured and predicted velocity and initial momentum (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, the within- and between-day coefficients of variation were 4.95-10.2% and 6.15-12.1%, respectively, for all variables. Within- and between-day intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.72-0.99 and 0.92-0.99, respectively, for all variables, indicating moderate to excellent reliability. Our findings show that the Impulse Block Method is valid and reliable for analysing a range of striking performance variables in well-targeted and perpendicular linear strikes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2477855
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of a novel impulse-based method to analyse human striking performance

Ben Hoffman, Dean E. Mills, Celeste E. Coltman, Sherrilyn Walters et al.
3 citations
Journal of Sports Sciences
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
14.28
article

Validity and reliability of a novel impulse-based method to analyse human striking performance

Ben Hoffman, Dean E. Mills, Celeste E. Coltman, Sherrilyn Walters, L. E. Walters
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We investigated the criterion validity and within- and between-day reliability of a novel method for human striking performance assessment. The Impulse Block Method allows the measurement and calculation of a range of striking variables using a load cell incorporating an impact absorption block and laser gate timer. To assess the criterion validity, we performed repeated drop tests and compared the relationship and agreement between predicted and measured velocity and initial momentum (calculated from impulse) with predicted values using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, 10 healthy adults performed palm strikes against the Impulse Block on two occasions, and within- and between-day reliability was calculated for impulse, initial momentum, velocity, effective mass, kinetic energy, and power. There was a strong linear relationship and high agreement between measured and predicted velocity and initial momentum (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, the within- and between-day coefficients of variation were 4.95-10.2% and 6.15-12.1%, respectively, for all variables. Within- and between-day intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.72-0.99 and 0.92-0.99, respectively, for all variables, indicating moderate to excellent reliability. Our findings show that the Impulse Block Method is valid and reliable for analysing a range of striking performance variables in well-targeted and perpendicular linear strikes.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 43(9)
Griffith University (AU), University of Southern Queensland (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Martel (CH), ACT Government (AU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
14.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.