Pretreatment and Valorization of Critical Materials from Lithium‐Ion Batteries Using Electrostatic and Magnetic Separation

The electric revolution has driven a significant increase in the use of rechargeable batteries, particularly lithium‐ion batteries, which contain several strategic elements and critical materials: Li, Co, Ni, P, and graphite. Efficient recovery of these materials is crucial to enhancing the resilience of the materials supply chain. Traditional recycling methods such as pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy have limitations, including high carbon intensity, cost, and limited material recovery. Robust physical separation pretreatment technologies can increase material purity for recycling. This study shows the utilization of electrostatic and magnetic separation processes across four distinct commercial cathode chemistries to produce high‐grade cathodic and anodic electrode products. Production scrap and end‐of‐life cells are used, with LiMn 2 O 4 –LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 (LMO/NCA), LiFePO 4 (LFP), LiCoO 2 (LCO), and LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC532) cathode chemistries, all partnered with graphite anodes. The application of these two separation technologies significantly improves the separation efficiency of shredded electrodes, leading to >98% recovery of shredded NMC cathode electrodes, and with >99% recovery of LMO–NCA electrodes, and >98% recovery of LFP electrodes. LCO is not found to be suitable for these separation processes. These advanced pretreatment methods produce high‐purity concentrates of valuable cathode feedstocks, which can support secondary (critical) material feedstocks, and ultimately will reduce subsequent energy consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202400366
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pretreatment and Valorization of Critical Materials from Lithium‐Ion Batteries Using Electrostatic and Magnetic Separation

Elizabeth H. Driscoll, Emma Kendrick, Roberto Sommerville, Kristian E. Waters et al.
1 citations
Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research
Extraction and Separation Processes
0.71
article

Pretreatment and Valorization of Critical Materials from Lithium‐Ion Batteries Using Electrostatic and Magnetic Separation

Elizabeth H. Driscoll, Emma Kendrick, Roberto Sommerville, Kristian E. Waters, Hyowon Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The electric revolution has driven a significant increase in the use of rechargeable batteries, particularly lithium‐ion batteries, which contain several strategic elements and critical materials: Li, Co, Ni, P, and graphite. Efficient recovery of these materials is crucial to enhancing the resilience of the materials supply chain. Traditional recycling methods such as pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy have limitations, including high carbon intensity, cost, and limited material recovery. Robust physical separation pretreatment technologies can increase material purity for recycling. This study shows the utilization of electrostatic and magnetic separation processes across four distinct commercial cathode chemistries to produce high‐grade cathodic and anodic electrode products. Production scrap and end‐of‐life cells are used, with LiMn 2 O 4 –LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 (LMO/NCA), LiFePO 4 (LFP), LiCoO 2 (LCO), and LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC532) cathode chemistries, all partnered with graphite anodes. The application of these two separation technologies significantly improves the separation efficiency of shredded electrodes, leading to >98% recovery of shredded NMC cathode electrodes, and with >99% recovery of LMO–NCA electrodes, and >98% recovery of LFP electrodes. LCO is not found to be suitable for these separation processes. These advanced pretreatment methods produce high‐purity concentrates of valuable cathode feedstocks, which can support secondary (critical) material feedstocks, and ultimately will reduce subsequent energy consumption.

Advanced Energy and Sustainability ResearchVol. 6(9)
The Faraday Institution (GB), McGill University (CA), University of Birmingham (GB)
Faraday Institution, Innovate UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Extraction and Separation Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.