Co‐occurrence analysis of the correlation of antibodies to glycolipids or ganglioside complexes with clinical features: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract Aims Various combinations of antibodies to glycolipids or ganglioside complexes (GSCs) are found in Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). Specific combinations of co‐occurring antibodies are thought to be associated with specific clinical phenotypes of GBS/MFS. However, the clinical implications of antibody combinations have not been fully investigated. This study was performed to identify probable antibody combinations and to examine correlations between these combinations and clinical symptoms. Methods The subjects were 315 patients with GBS ( n = 226) or MFS ( n = 89) with anti‐glycolipid‐antibodies. The co‐occurrence of anti‐glycolipid antibodies was analyzed using ‘KH Coder,’ a software program for identifying co‐occurrence networks. Correlations between subgroups of co‐occurring antibodies and clinical features were also analyzed. Results Five unique autoantibody subgroups were identified. In each subgroup, the main autoantibodies were Anti‐ GQ1b , − GT1a antibodies (subgroup 1), Anti‐ GM1 , − GA1 , ‐ GalNAc ‐ GD1a , and ‐ GD1b antibodies (subgroup 2), Anti‐ GM1 / GM2 , − GM1 / GalNAc ‐ GD1a , and other Anti‐ GSC antibodies (subgroup 3), Anti‐ GM1 / GT1b , − GM1 / GalNAc ‐ GD1a , and other Anti‐ GSC antibodies (subgroup 4), and Anti‐ GD1a / GQ1b , ‐ GD1a / GT1a , and other Anti‐ GSC antibodies (subgroup 5). Antecedent infection ( P = .0376), clinical diagnosis ( P < .0001), clinical phenotype ( P < .0001) and cranial nerve involvement ( P < .001) differed significantly across subgroups. Subgroup 1 most frequently had respiratory antecedent infection, contained MFS cases, and had cases that developed cranial nerve deficiencies. Subgroup 3 contained the largest proportion of GBS cases. Conclusion These results suggest that co‐occurrence of anti‐glycolipid antibodies can be classified into five subgroups. Each subgroup exhibits different clinical characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cen3.70005
Primary Topic
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co‐occurrence analysis of the correlation of antibodies to glycolipids or ganglioside complexes with clinical features: A retrospective cohort study

Hiroshi Takazaki, Keishi Yamazaki, Yukari Komuta, Kenichi Kaida et al.
Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
article

Co‐occurrence analysis of the correlation of antibodies to glycolipids or ganglioside complexes with clinical features: A retrospective cohort study

Hiroshi Takazaki, Keishi Yamazaki, Yukari Komuta, Kenichi Kaida, Kazushi Suzuki, Yu Hongo, Keiko Miyake, Taro Matsui
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Various combinations of antibodies to glycolipids or ganglioside complexes (GSCs) are found in Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). Specific combinations of co‐occurring antibodies are thought to be associated with specific clinical phenotypes of GBS/MFS. However, the clinical implications of antibody combinations have not been fully investigated. This study was performed to identify probable antibody combinations and to examine correlations between these combinations and clinical symptoms. Methods The subjects were 315 patients with GBS ( n = 226) or MFS ( n = 89) with anti‐glycolipid‐antibodies. The co‐occurrence of anti‐glycolipid antibodies was analyzed using ‘KH Coder,’ a software program for identifying co‐occurrence networks. Correlations between subgroups of co‐occurring antibodies and clinical features were also analyzed. Results Five unique autoantibody subgroups were identified. In each subgroup, the main autoantibodies were Anti‐ GQ1b , − GT1a antibodies (subgroup 1), Anti‐ GM1 , − GA1 , ‐ GalNAc ‐ GD1a , and ‐ GD1b antibodies (subgroup 2), Anti‐ GM1 / GM2 , − GM1 / GalNAc ‐ GD1a , and other Anti‐ GSC antibodies (subgroup 3), Anti‐ GM1 / GT1b , − GM1 / GalNAc ‐ GD1a , and other Anti‐ GSC antibodies (subgroup 4), and Anti‐ GD1a / GQ1b , ‐ GD1a / GT1a , and other Anti‐ GSC antibodies (subgroup 5). Antecedent infection ( P = .0376), clinical diagnosis ( P < .0001), clinical phenotype ( P < .0001) and cranial nerve involvement ( P < .001) differed significantly across subgroups. Subgroup 1 most frequently had respiratory antecedent infection, contained MFS cases, and had cases that developed cranial nerve deficiencies. Subgroup 3 contained the largest proportion of GBS cases. Conclusion These results suggest that co‐occurrence of anti‐glycolipid antibodies can be classified into five subgroups. Each subgroup exhibits different clinical characteristics.

Clinical and Experimental NeuroimmunologyVol. 17(1)
National Defense Medical College Hospital (JP), Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital (JP), Saitama Medical University (JP)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.