Integrating Multi-Temporal Feature Ranking with Forecasting Models for Enhanced Stock Price Prediction

Achieving high prediction accuracy remains challenging due to the inherent volatility and complexity of financial markets. This study aims to bridge the gap by integrating effective feature selection and advanced modeling, combining multi-temporal feature ranking with 10 state-of-the-art (SOTA) predictive models. By analyzing constituent stocks of the Chinese CSI 800 and CSI 1000 indices from January 4th, 2007, to September 28th, 2023, and incorporating 13 features from three temporal frequencies, we found that Bayesian LightGBM has a 5.7% higher Mean Squared Error (MSE) but a 34.8% lower Mean Absolute Error (MAE) compared to Bayesian XGBoost. A backtest on the portfolio was conducted to validate the reconstructed data. Additionally, in predictive inference, Autoformer shows an 18.68% lower Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and a 16.88% higher MAE than Informer. This paper offers valuable insights into the financial machine learning process and its application across various temporal datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24135/iconip9
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Multi-Temporal Feature Ranking with Forecasting Models for Enhanced Stock Price Prediction

Hefei Wang, Zhenhao Li
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Integrating Multi-Temporal Feature Ranking with Forecasting Models for Enhanced Stock Price Prediction

Hefei Wang, Zhenhao Li
article en

Abstract

Achieving high prediction accuracy remains challenging due to the inherent volatility and complexity of financial markets. This study aims to bridge the gap by integrating effective feature selection and advanced modeling, combining multi-temporal feature ranking with 10 state-of-the-art (SOTA) predictive models. By analyzing constituent stocks of the Chinese CSI 800 and CSI 1000 indices from January 4th, 2007, to September 28th, 2023, and incorporating 13 features from three temporal frequencies, we found that Bayesian LightGBM has a 5.7% higher Mean Squared Error (MSE) but a 34.8% lower Mean Absolute Error (MAE) compared to Bayesian XGBoost. A backtest on the portfolio was conducted to validate the reconstructed data. Additionally, in predictive inference, Autoformer shows an 18.68% lower Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and a 16.88% higher MAE than Informer. This paper offers valuable insights into the financial machine learning process and its application across various temporal datasets.

Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.