Monitoring and detecting SARS-CoV-2 in Albanian Clinical Practice – The efficiency of CLIA serological assay, Real-Time PCR analysis and Biochemical analysis

SARS – CoV-2 is a pathogenic coronavirus which continuously evolves as changes in the genetic code occur during the replication of the genome. To monitor and detect this infection a combination of 3 parameters is used in Albanian Clinical Practice. Real-Time PCR analysis is the main standard for the identification of SARS-CoV-2- infection. Because of the limits in its utilization for large-scale screening, serological assays have been used for detecting SARS-CoV-2 presence, accompanied by the monitoring level of White blood cells, Red blood cells and CRP (C-reactive Protein) check. This study aims to choose and highlight the best methodology and its efficiency in COVID-19 diagnostics. Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from 1198 patients which were analyzed after with RT-PCR. After 90 of these patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus blood samples were collected from them to perform biochemical analysis. Only 55 of them were subjected to CLIA serological assay. As a result, 49 (89.1%) patients were positive only for IgG, 4 (7.3%) patients were positive for both antibodies IgG and IgM and only 2(3.6%) patients were negative for both antibodies, based on serological results. The level of CRP varied from X- to 25.09 mg/L ad the most affected group of immunological cells were monocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils along with red blood cells, hematocrit and hemoglobin. However, both molecular and biochemical assays had better performance 8-10 days after symptoms appearance, meanwhile, the serological assay was more predictable at least 10 days after symptoms appearance. In conclusion, the three methodologies used separately are limited in usefulness when diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection but a combination of them is the most effective way to diagnose this virus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biological Studies
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62400/jbs.v8i1.13923
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring and detecting SARS-CoV-2 in Albanian Clinical Practice – The efficiency of CLIA serological assay, Real-Time PCR analysis and Biochemical analysis

Stela Papa, Paola Xhelili, Teuta Bare, Linda Luarasi
Journal of Biological Studies
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
article

Monitoring and detecting SARS-CoV-2 in Albanian Clinical Practice – The efficiency of CLIA serological assay, Real-Time PCR analysis and Biochemical analysis

Stela Papa, Paola Xhelili, Teuta Bare, Linda Luarasi
article en

Abstract

SARS – CoV-2 is a pathogenic coronavirus which continuously evolves as changes in the genetic code occur during the replication of the genome. To monitor and detect this infection a combination of 3 parameters is used in Albanian Clinical Practice. Real-Time PCR analysis is the main standard for the identification of SARS-CoV-2- infection. Because of the limits in its utilization for large-scale screening, serological assays have been used for detecting SARS-CoV-2 presence, accompanied by the monitoring level of White blood cells, Red blood cells and CRP (C-reactive Protein) check. This study aims to choose and highlight the best methodology and its efficiency in COVID-19 diagnostics. Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from 1198 patients which were analyzed after with RT-PCR. After 90 of these patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus blood samples were collected from them to perform biochemical analysis. Only 55 of them were subjected to CLIA serological assay. As a result, 49 (89.1%) patients were positive only for IgG, 4 (7.3%) patients were positive for both antibodies IgG and IgM and only 2(3.6%) patients were negative for both antibodies, based on serological results. The level of CRP varied from X- to 25.09 mg/L ad the most affected group of immunological cells were monocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils along with red blood cells, hematocrit and hemoglobin. However, both molecular and biochemical assays had better performance 8-10 days after symptoms appearance, meanwhile, the serological assay was more predictable at least 10 days after symptoms appearance. In conclusion, the three methodologies used separately are limited in usefulness when diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection but a combination of them is the most effective way to diagnose this virus.

Journal of Biological StudiesVol. 8(1)
Agricultural University of Tirana (AL), University of Tirana (AL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monitoring and detecting SARS-CoV-2 in Albanian Clinical Practice – The efficiency of CLIA serological assay, Real-Time PCR analysis and Biochemical analysis — Stela Papa, Paola Xhelili, et al. · Journal of Biological Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS