PERCEPTIONS OF THE RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS REGARDING OSCE AS AN EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT METHOD IN NURSING EXAMINATION

Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a widely recognized method for assessing clinical competencies in nursing education, offering a structured and objective evaluation of students' psychomotor, cognitive, and affective domains. Unlike conventional practical examinations, OSCE reduces subjectivity and enhances reliability. Despite its proven effectiveness, its implementation in nursing education in developing countries remains limited. Understanding stakeholder perceptions is crucial for optimizing OSCE execution. This study explores the views of students, examiners, and policymakers on OSCE as an assessment tool in nursing education. Objective: To explore the perceptions of relevant stakeholders regarding OSCE as an effective assessment tool in nursing examinations. Methods: A qualitative exploratory-descriptive study was conducted among ten stakeholders, including six Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students and four nursing faculty members. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth individual interviews, audio-recorded with consent. Transcribed data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Lincoln and Guba’s framework to ensure credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committee of Rehman Medical Institute. Results: Three main themes emerged: perceptions regarding OSCE, resources for OSCE, and challenges faced during OSCE. Within these, subthemes included purpose, station design, benefits, reliability, validity, availability of standardized patients, integration of technology, space constraints, student anxiety (80%), examiner bias (70%), inadequate resources (75%), and exam content leaks (60%). While 90% of respondents considered OSCE fair and systematic, 85% acknowledged its role in skill enhancement, and 88% found it beneficial in boosting student confidence. However, 65% identified limited standardized patient availability as a barrier. Conclusion: Stakeholders viewed OSCE as a valid and effective assessment method in nursing education. Ensuring adequate resources, examiner training, and structured student preparation is essential for optimizing OSCE implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/m9adb829
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERCEPTIONS OF THE RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS REGARDING OSCE AS AN EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT METHOD IN NURSING EXAMINATION

Zahraa Mahdi Abd Ali, Maryam Bibi, Rehan Ullah, Salman Nasib et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Innovations in Medical Education
article

PERCEPTIONS OF THE RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS REGARDING OSCE AS AN EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT METHOD IN NURSING EXAMINATION

Zahraa Mahdi Abd Ali, Maryam Bibi, Rehan Ullah, Salman Nasib, Bareera Shahid, Farwa Shakeel
article en

Abstract

Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a widely recognized method for assessing clinical competencies in nursing education, offering a structured and objective evaluation of students' psychomotor, cognitive, and affective domains. Unlike conventional practical examinations, OSCE reduces subjectivity and enhances reliability. Despite its proven effectiveness, its implementation in nursing education in developing countries remains limited. Understanding stakeholder perceptions is crucial for optimizing OSCE execution. This study explores the views of students, examiners, and policymakers on OSCE as an assessment tool in nursing education. Objective: To explore the perceptions of relevant stakeholders regarding OSCE as an effective assessment tool in nursing examinations. Methods: A qualitative exploratory-descriptive study was conducted among ten stakeholders, including six Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students and four nursing faculty members. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth individual interviews, audio-recorded with consent. Transcribed data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Lincoln and Guba’s framework to ensure credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committee of Rehman Medical Institute. Results: Three main themes emerged: perceptions regarding OSCE, resources for OSCE, and challenges faced during OSCE. Within these, subthemes included purpose, station design, benefits, reliability, validity, availability of standardized patients, integration of technology, space constraints, student anxiety (80%), examiner bias (70%), inadequate resources (75%), and exam content leaks (60%). While 90% of respondents considered OSCE fair and systematic, 85% acknowledged its role in skill enhancement, and 88% found it beneficial in boosting student confidence. However, 65% identified limited standardized patient availability as a barrier. Conclusion: Stakeholders viewed OSCE as a valid and effective assessment method in nursing education. Ensuring adequate resources, examiner training, and structured student preparation is essential for optimizing OSCE implementation.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(2 (Health & Rehab))
University of Peshawar (PK), Institute of Management Sciences Peshawar (PK), University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar (PK)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.