Fact-based environmental messaging did not influence Australians' attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood

Our oceans currently experience perilous times from a worsening climate crisis and other human impacts. Wild caught and farmed seafood production represents a primary human impact on marine ecosystems. Urgent action must be taken to reduce the effects of these impacts while simultaneously considering the protein needs of a growing global population. Cultivated seafood is a food product of the cellular agriculture industry, which seeks to create alternative seafood production methods. Cultivated seafood has the potential to significantly reduce our reliance on wild-caught fish and aquaculture systems. Consumer perceptions will play a vital role in the acceptance and uptake of such products. We investigated consumer perceptions of cultivated seafood for Australians ( N = 1005). Using a 2 × 3 factorial design, we tested whether fact-based environmental messaging influenced attitudes and intentions to try and eat cultivated seafood, and seafood from wild-caught and farmed production systems. We also investigated whether demographic variables related to attitudes and intentions for each seafood production type. We found that environmental messaging did not influence consumers attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood. However, it did reduce participants attitudes and intentions to consume wild-caught seafood. Males and younger participants reported more favourable attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood. Higher preferences for seafood saw stronger attitudes and intentions towards consumption of all seafood production systems. Understanding drivers of consumers' attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood will inform communication approaches highlighting the positive potential of cultivated seafood and contribute to its successful introduction to the mass market. • Factual messaging did not influence Australian's perceptions of cultivated seafood. • Messaging reduced Australians' perceptions of wild-caught seafood. • 30 % of participants intended to try cultivated seafood. • Research into motivating messaging frames is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105514
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fact-based environmental messaging did not influence Australians' attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood

Adam P. A. Cardilini, Pol C. Lim Francis, Alexa Hayley, Sarah Cook
3 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
3.32
article

Fact-based environmental messaging did not influence Australians' attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood

Adam P. A. Cardilini, Pol C. Lim Francis, Alexa Hayley, Sarah Cook
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Our oceans currently experience perilous times from a worsening climate crisis and other human impacts. Wild caught and farmed seafood production represents a primary human impact on marine ecosystems. Urgent action must be taken to reduce the effects of these impacts while simultaneously considering the protein needs of a growing global population. Cultivated seafood is a food product of the cellular agriculture industry, which seeks to create alternative seafood production methods. Cultivated seafood has the potential to significantly reduce our reliance on wild-caught fish and aquaculture systems. Consumer perceptions will play a vital role in the acceptance and uptake of such products. We investigated consumer perceptions of cultivated seafood for Australians ( N = 1005). Using a 2 × 3 factorial design, we tested whether fact-based environmental messaging influenced attitudes and intentions to try and eat cultivated seafood, and seafood from wild-caught and farmed production systems. We also investigated whether demographic variables related to attitudes and intentions for each seafood production type. We found that environmental messaging did not influence consumers attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood. However, it did reduce participants attitudes and intentions to consume wild-caught seafood. Males and younger participants reported more favourable attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood. Higher preferences for seafood saw stronger attitudes and intentions towards consumption of all seafood production systems. Understanding drivers of consumers' attitudes and intentions towards cultivated seafood will inform communication approaches highlighting the positive potential of cultivated seafood and contribute to its successful introduction to the mass market. • Factual messaging did not influence Australian's perceptions of cultivated seafood. • Messaging reduced Australians' perceptions of wild-caught seafood. • 30 % of participants intended to try cultivated seafood. • Research into motivating messaging frames is warranted.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 129
Deakin University (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.