Logical Analysis for Detecting Bias in AI

The purpose of this study is to establish a logical foundation for identifying and addressing bias in AI technology. Bias is not merely an error but an inherent aspect of human cognition and social structures. Rather than attempting to eliminate it entirely, ethical efforts should focus on analyzing and adjusting its effects. AI bias is particularly concerning because it has the potential to reflect or even exacerbate existing social inequalities. Therefore, a careful approach is required at every stage, from data collection and processing to algorithm design. This study examines the logical fallacy underlying AI bias, beginning with the issue of hasty generalization—where conclusions are drawn too broadly based on limited data or specific cases. Just as humans are susceptible to cognitive biases such as confirmation bias and availability bias, AI systems also face similar challenges due to the limitations of their training data. Moreover, bias in AI is often multifaceted. It does not arise from a single factor but rather emerges through the interaction and amplification of various social, technical, and data-related influences. The primary sources of such complex bias include data bias, algorithmic bias, and societal bias. To mitigate AI bias, it is essential to collect more comprehensive and balanced datasets, continuously review and improve algorithms, and actively pursue ethical AI design. For AI to make fairer and more reliable decisions, it is crucial to avoid hasty generalizations and to ensure diversity and representativeness in training data. This serves as a logical starting point in the pursuit of more equitable AI systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Society for Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59728/jaie.2025.4.1.72
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Logical Analysis for Detecting Bias in AI

Sun-Yong Byun, Hyun-Cheol Choi
The Korean Society for Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Logical Analysis for Detecting Bias in AI

Sun-Yong Byun, Hyun-Cheol Choi
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish a logical foundation for identifying and addressing bias in AI technology. Bias is not merely an error but an inherent aspect of human cognition and social structures. Rather than attempting to eliminate it entirely, ethical efforts should focus on analyzing and adjusting its effects. AI bias is particularly concerning because it has the potential to reflect or even exacerbate existing social inequalities. Therefore, a careful approach is required at every stage, from data collection and processing to algorithm design. This study examines the logical fallacy underlying AI bias, beginning with the issue of hasty generalization—where conclusions are drawn too broadly based on limited data or specific cases. Just as humans are susceptible to cognitive biases such as confirmation bias and availability bias, AI systems also face similar challenges due to the limitations of their training data. Moreover, bias in AI is often multifaceted. It does not arise from a single factor but rather emerges through the interaction and amplification of various social, technical, and data-related influences. The primary sources of such complex bias include data bias, algorithmic bias, and societal bias. To mitigate AI bias, it is essential to collect more comprehensive and balanced datasets, continuously review and improve algorithms, and actively pursue ethical AI design. For AI to make fairer and more reliable decisions, it is crucial to avoid hasty generalizations and to ensure diversity and representativeness in training data. This serves as a logical starting point in the pursuit of more equitable AI systems.

The Korean Society for Artificial Intelligence EthicsVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Logical Analysis for Detecting Bias in AI — Sun-Yong Byun, Hyun-Cheol Choi · The Korean Society for Artificial Intelligence Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS