Disclosure of Adverse Events in Pediatrics: Policy Statement

Disclosure of adverse events has become the expectation in medicine and is widely regarded as the appropriate path when medical errors occur. Although data are limited on adverse events in pediatrics, that they occur frequently is uncontested. Types and rates of errors vary depending on the care setting and patient population. Patients with complex medical conditions or from historically marginalized groups or minoritized communities likely suffer disparate health and safety outcomes. Systemic factors, including nonpunitive safety cultures and supportive environments within institutions, are essential to promoting disclosure. State laws protecting apologies from use in legal proceedings can also help to encourage open communication. Some states have adopted laws to advance disclosure, and governmental agencies provide materials encouraging open communication and early resolution after adverse events occur. Many programs emphasize the importance of supporting health care workers involved in adverse events. Shame, fear of professional and legal repercussions, and lack of training remain barriers to disclosure. Education for health care clinicians, support in health care settings, additional research on programs and disparities, and governmental and regulatory initiatives can support disclosure of adverse events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PEDIATRICS
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2025-070880
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disclosure of Adverse Events in Pediatrics: Policy Statement

Steven A. Bondi, Daniel R. Neuspiel, Amy Tyler, John Chuo et al.
4 citations
PEDIATRICS
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
8.09
article

Disclosure of Adverse Events in Pediatrics: Policy Statement

Steven A. Bondi, Daniel R. Neuspiel, Amy Tyler, John Chuo, Michelle Terry, Alan L. Nager, David Horowitz, Laura Sigman, Sarah Northrop, Jonathan Muraskas, Ulfat Shaikh, Joyee Vachani, Sandra P. Spencer, Corinna J. Rea, Meghan Drayton Jackson, Craig H. Gosdin, Mary Beth Miotto, Julia M. Kim, Kajal Khanna, Ryan Earl Alanzalon, Preethi Srinivasakumar, Robert Turbow, Raina Paul, Francisco Javier Álvarez Gutiérrez
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Disclosure of adverse events has become the expectation in medicine and is widely regarded as the appropriate path when medical errors occur. Although data are limited on adverse events in pediatrics, that they occur frequently is uncontested. Types and rates of errors vary depending on the care setting and patient population. Patients with complex medical conditions or from historically marginalized groups or minoritized communities likely suffer disparate health and safety outcomes. Systemic factors, including nonpunitive safety cultures and supportive environments within institutions, are essential to promoting disclosure. State laws protecting apologies from use in legal proceedings can also help to encourage open communication. Some states have adopted laws to advance disclosure, and governmental agencies provide materials encouraging open communication and early resolution after adverse events occur. Many programs emphasize the importance of supporting health care workers involved in adverse events. Shame, fear of professional and legal repercussions, and lack of training remain barriers to disclosure. Education for health care clinicians, support in health care settings, additional research on programs and disparities, and governmental and regulatory initiatives can support disclosure of adverse events.

PEDIATRICSVol. 155(4)
Johns Hopkins University (US), California Polytechnic State University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Atrium Medical Cente (US), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
8.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.