Powder Flowability Evaluation with Die Filling Testing Devices

Commonly, flow rate (ISO 4490, JIS Z 2502, MPIF Standard 3) is used to evaluate powder flow. However, it may not be possible to measure flow rate because powder is not discharged from the orifice, and sometimes flow rate does not correspond to the actual production of parts in terms of productibility or weight variation. To examine the evaluation method of powder flow for die filling, we conducted measurements using evaluation devices (die filling testing devices) which are close to the actual die filling of pressing machines, owned by three powder producing member companies of the Technical Committee for Metal Powders of the Japan Powder Metallurgy Association. In addition, the powders used for this evaluation were those used in actual production by three member companies who manufacture components, from the same committee. As a result, it was found that appropriate quantitative evaluation is possible within the range of standard parameter conditions. On the other hand, it was also found that valid evaluations could not be obtained outside this range. We would like to discuss the possibility of standardization by further limiting parameter conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2497/jjspm.14c-sis1-03
Primary Topic
Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Powder Flowability Evaluation with Die Filling Testing Devices

Norimitsu Hirose, Shigeyuki Saito, Tetsuya Sawayama, Keiichi Uemoto et al.
Journal of the Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy
Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
article

Powder Flowability Evaluation with Die Filling Testing Devices

Norimitsu Hirose, Shigeyuki Saito, Tetsuya Sawayama, Keiichi Uemoto, Yoshihisa Ueda, Hiroi Ioka
article en

Abstract

Commonly, flow rate (ISO 4490, JIS Z 2502, MPIF Standard 3) is used to evaluate powder flow. However, it may not be possible to measure flow rate because powder is not discharged from the orifice, and sometimes flow rate does not correspond to the actual production of parts in terms of productibility or weight variation. To examine the evaluation method of powder flow for die filling, we conducted measurements using evaluation devices (die filling testing devices) which are close to the actual die filling of pressing machines, owned by three powder producing member companies of the Technical Committee for Metal Powders of the Japan Powder Metallurgy Association. In addition, the powders used for this evaluation were those used in actual production by three member companies who manufacture components, from the same committee. As a result, it was found that appropriate quantitative evaluation is possible within the range of standard parameter conditions. On the other hand, it was also found that valid evaluations could not be obtained outside this range. We would like to discuss the possibility of standardization by further limiting parameter conditions.

Journal of the Japan Society of Powder and Powder MetallurgyVol. 72(Supplement)
Sumitomo Electric Industries (United States) (US), Kobe Steel (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.