“Eliminate Anthropology”: Attitudes toward social science in the public discourse

Abstract What do people think about anthropology and other disciplines in the social sciences and liberal arts? How do negative views of anthropology influence the discipline's future? A review of public discourse from news, commentaries, scholarly literature, monographs, and institutional reports reveals anthropology's current state and direction. The results point to great distress. Analysis demonstrates powerful disapproval of higher education, the liberal arts, and social sciences threatens the instruction, practice, and ethos of anthropology. Narrative domains in popular discourse reveal active attitudes demanding and executing audits, cuts, and closures of anthropology departments; legislation restricting teaching and research; and the dissolution of anthropology's legitimacy. This review demonstrates the existence and power of such popular narratives, analyzes how they reflect a common political‐economic threat to the discipline, then asks difficult, critical questions before offering recommendations to confront one of the discipline's darkest moments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Anthropologist
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.28055
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Eliminate Anthropology”: Attitudes toward social science in the public discourse

José Leonardo Santos
2 citations
American Anthropologist
Academic Freedom and Politics
17.04
article

“Eliminate Anthropology”: Attitudes toward social science in the public discourse

José Leonardo Santos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract What do people think about anthropology and other disciplines in the social sciences and liberal arts? How do negative views of anthropology influence the discipline's future? A review of public discourse from news, commentaries, scholarly literature, monographs, and institutional reports reveals anthropology's current state and direction. The results point to great distress. Analysis demonstrates powerful disapproval of higher education, the liberal arts, and social sciences threatens the instruction, practice, and ethos of anthropology. Narrative domains in popular discourse reveal active attitudes demanding and executing audits, cuts, and closures of anthropology departments; legislation restricting teaching and research; and the dissolution of anthropology's legitimacy. This review demonstrates the existence and power of such popular narratives, analyzes how they reflect a common political‐economic threat to the discipline, then asks difficult, critical questions before offering recommendations to confront one of the discipline's darkest moments.

American AnthropologistVol. 127(2)
Metropolitan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Academic Freedom and Politics
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.