The Future of International Criminal Justice is Corporate

Abstract The article explores the evolving recognition of corporate liability within international criminal law (ICL), traditionally centred on individual criminal responsibility. It underscores the involvement of multinational corporations in international crimes, human rights abuse and environmental harm. The article examines domestic and international legal frameworks, including the Malabo Protocol, which explicitly incorporates corporate liability for core international crimes and transnational crimes. It contrasts nominalist and organizational models of corporate liability and addresses conceptual challenges such as corporate intent and agency. The article advocates for integrating corporate liability into ICL responses to atrocity crimes, emphasizing its potential to bridge the Global North-South asymmetry in liability and provide equitable justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaf004
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Future of International Criminal Justice is Corporate

E. van Sliedregt
2 citations
Journal of International Criminal Justice
International Law and Human Rights
17.04
article

The Future of International Criminal Justice is Corporate

E. van Sliedregt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The article explores the evolving recognition of corporate liability within international criminal law (ICL), traditionally centred on individual criminal responsibility. It underscores the involvement of multinational corporations in international crimes, human rights abuse and environmental harm. The article examines domestic and international legal frameworks, including the Malabo Protocol, which explicitly incorporates corporate liability for core international crimes and transnational crimes. It contrasts nominalist and organizational models of corporate liability and addresses conceptual challenges such as corporate intent and agency. The article advocates for integrating corporate liability into ICL responses to atrocity crimes, emphasizing its potential to bridge the Global North-South asymmetry in liability and provide equitable justice.

Journal of International Criminal JusticeVol. 23(1)
Tilburg University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Law and Human Rights
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.