“But we met expectations! Why us?”: Threats to anthropology and learning from the program cut at UNC Greensboro

Abstract This Vital Topics Forum focuses on the host of challenges that now threaten the future of anthropology. The political polarization of the current era, along with the economic rationale that matches it, leads to policy and legislation restricting content and speech in universities, cuts and closure of anthropology programs, and the loss of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives. This combines the loss of careers and opportunities with the elimination of anthropological perspectives from public discourse. Cultural shifts delegitimize and devalue the discipline, which struggles not only to increase its ranks but to maintain its presence within and outside the academy. The articles within this Vital Topics Forum engage with these challenges while raising an alarm to all anthropologists that the threat to the discipline is real and requires immediate responses from practitioners, instructors, scholars, programs and departments, and our professional organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Anthropologist
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.28057
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“But we met expectations! Why us?”: Threats to anthropology and learning from the program cut at UNC Greensboro

Keri Vacanti Brondo, Susan Andreatta
2 citations
American Anthropologist
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
17.04
article

“But we met expectations! Why us?”: Threats to anthropology and learning from the program cut at UNC Greensboro

Keri Vacanti Brondo, Susan Andreatta
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This Vital Topics Forum focuses on the host of challenges that now threaten the future of anthropology. The political polarization of the current era, along with the economic rationale that matches it, leads to policy and legislation restricting content and speech in universities, cuts and closure of anthropology programs, and the loss of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives. This combines the loss of careers and opportunities with the elimination of anthropological perspectives from public discourse. Cultural shifts delegitimize and devalue the discipline, which struggles not only to increase its ranks but to maintain its presence within and outside the academy. The articles within this Vital Topics Forum engage with these challenges while raising an alarm to all anthropologists that the threat to the discipline is real and requires immediate responses from practitioners, instructors, scholars, programs and departments, and our professional organizations.

American AnthropologistVol. 127(2)
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“But we met expectations! Why us?”: Threats to anthropology and learning from the program cut at UNC Greensboro — Keri Vacanti Brondo, Susan Andreatta · American Anthropologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS