Reporting and Methodological Qualities of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation Journals After 2020: A Cross-Sectional Meta-Epidemiological Study
The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in rehabilitation journals is insufficient. It is important to improve the reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in rehabilitation journals. It is recommended that researchers not only declare their reporting use of the PRISMA 2020 statement, but also adhere to each item correctly.
Authors
- Shunsuke Taito (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1218-4225)
- Norio Yamamoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-9994)
- Daijo Shiratsuchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0220-7940)
- Akikazu Hagiyama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-0669)
- Takashi Yorifuji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2543-5441)
- Takahiro Tsuge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-944X)
- Yosuke Tomita (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1205-165X)
- Yukiko Kato
Institutions
- Kagoshima University (JP)
- Okayama University (JP)
- Takasaki University of Health and Welfare (JP)
- Okayama University Hospital (JP)
- Kurashiki Medical Center (JP)
- Iwaki Kyoritsu General Hospital (JP)
- Hiroshima University Hospital (JP)
- Scientific Research and Development (Germany) (DE)
- Keio University Shonan Fujisawa (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physical Therapy
- Published
- 2025-03-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf032
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.99