“We No Longer Only Carry Flowers”: Radicalization Processes Among the Belarusian Opposition-in-Exile

This article explores radicalization processes among the Belarusian opposition-in-exile using resource mobilization theory. Drawing on the case of the post-2020 opposition, exiled in the European Union and recognized by the West as a privileged interlocutor and “legitimate representative of the [Belarusian] people,” it identifies the stages of its radicalization in response to repression in Belarus and Russia’s aggression against Ukraine: first a peaceful approach, then emphasis on self-defense, and finally preparation for violent resistance. It explains each stage by the aggregation and maintenance of a “resource threshold.” It counts domestic/exile networks and Western allies as resources crucial for activism among the exiled opposition. The article also argues that different strategies (peaceful versus violent) have been useful for achieving the resource threshold of the Belarusian opposition-in-exile depending on the domestic, host states’, and sponsor states’ political and geopolitical environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
East European Politics and Societies and Cultures
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254251321177
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We No Longer Only Carry Flowers”: Radicalization Processes Among the Belarusian Opposition-in-Exile

Ekaterina Pierson-Lyzhina
2 citations
East European Politics and Societies and Cultures
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
8.40
article

“We No Longer Only Carry Flowers”: Radicalization Processes Among the Belarusian Opposition-in-Exile

Ekaterina Pierson-Lyzhina
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article explores radicalization processes among the Belarusian opposition-in-exile using resource mobilization theory. Drawing on the case of the post-2020 opposition, exiled in the European Union and recognized by the West as a privileged interlocutor and “legitimate representative of the [Belarusian] people,” it identifies the stages of its radicalization in response to repression in Belarus and Russia’s aggression against Ukraine: first a peaceful approach, then emphasis on self-defense, and finally preparation for violent resistance. It explains each stage by the aggregation and maintenance of a “resource threshold.” It counts domestic/exile networks and Western allies as resources crucial for activism among the exiled opposition. The article also argues that different strategies (peaceful versus violent) have been useful for achieving the resource threshold of the Belarusian opposition-in-exile depending on the domestic, host states’, and sponsor states’ political and geopolitical environments.

East European Politics and Societies and Cultures
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.