Epidural stimulation for the management of spasticity in children with spinal cord injury sequelae

BACKGROUND: Spasticity and pain syndromes occur in 60–78% of patients with spinal cord injury above the lumbar enlargement. Spasticity and pain negatively affect rehabilitation outcomes and complicate patient care. Surgery methods initially yield good results but are associated with numerous complications in the long term. Lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation significantly reduces spasticity and pain in 61.8% of adults and may be a preferred method for managing spasticity and pain syndrome in children with spinal cord injury. AIM: To assess the long-term effectiveness of epidural spinal cord stimulation in the management of spasticity and pain syndrome in children with spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 15 children aged 14 to 17 years with spinal cord injury sequelae who were admitted to the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma since 2020. The assessment of the current condition was conducted through clinical assessment using the ASIA scale (to assess the impairment of spinal cord conduction), Ashworth and Tardieu scales (to assess muscle tone), MRS (to evaluate muscle strength), VAS (to measure pain syndrome), and the pendulum test. Additionally, an electromyographic assessment (F-wave) was performed to evaluate the severity of spasticity. RESULTS: An epidural stimulator was implanted in 15 patients. Positive outcomes were observed in 12 (80%) children, with a reduction in spasticity by an average of 1–2 points on the Ashworth and Tardieu scales. The pendulum test demonstrated improvement in 12 (80%) cases, showing an increase in oscillatory movements. Pain severity decreased in 12 (80%) patients, muscle strength improved in 10 (66.7%) patients, and electromyographic parameters (reduction in the number of pathological F-waves) improved in 9 (60%) patients. In 7 (46.7%) cases, the dose of antispastic medication was reduced. No clinical improvement was observed in 3 (20%) patients. CONCLUSION: Epidural stimulation is the treatment of choice for children with severe spastic syndrome due to spinal cord injury that is refractory to conservative therapy. Proper patient selection and objective assessment of their current condition increase the effectiveness of this method. In addition to improving pathological muscle tone, epidural stimulation also alleviates pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical and rehabilitation medicine medical rehabilitation
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab642017
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epidural stimulation for the management of spasticity in children with spinal cord injury sequelae

Svetlana А. Valiullina, Irina N. Novoselova, О. В. Попова, S. V. Meshcheryakov et al.
Physical and rehabilitation medicine medical rehabilitation
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

Epidural stimulation for the management of spasticity in children with spinal cord injury sequelae

Svetlana А. Valiullina, Irina N. Novoselova, О. В. Попова, S. V. Meshcheryakov, Alexey Gagloev
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spasticity and pain syndromes occur in 60–78% of patients with spinal cord injury above the lumbar enlargement. Spasticity and pain negatively affect rehabilitation outcomes and complicate patient care. Surgery methods initially yield good results but are associated with numerous complications in the long term. Lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation significantly reduces spasticity and pain in 61.8% of adults and may be a preferred method for managing spasticity and pain syndrome in children with spinal cord injury. AIM: To assess the long-term effectiveness of epidural spinal cord stimulation in the management of spasticity and pain syndrome in children with spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 15 children aged 14 to 17 years with spinal cord injury sequelae who were admitted to the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma since 2020. The assessment of the current condition was conducted through clinical assessment using the ASIA scale (to assess the impairment of spinal cord conduction), Ashworth and Tardieu scales (to assess muscle tone), MRS (to evaluate muscle strength), VAS (to measure pain syndrome), and the pendulum test. Additionally, an electromyographic assessment (F-wave) was performed to evaluate the severity of spasticity. RESULTS: An epidural stimulator was implanted in 15 patients. Positive outcomes were observed in 12 (80%) children, with a reduction in spasticity by an average of 1–2 points on the Ashworth and Tardieu scales. The pendulum test demonstrated improvement in 12 (80%) cases, showing an increase in oscillatory movements. Pain severity decreased in 12 (80%) patients, muscle strength improved in 10 (66.7%) patients, and electromyographic parameters (reduction in the number of pathological F-waves) improved in 9 (60%) patients. In 7 (46.7%) cases, the dose of antispastic medication was reduced. No clinical improvement was observed in 3 (20%) patients. CONCLUSION: Epidural stimulation is the treatment of choice for children with severe spastic syndrome due to spinal cord injury that is refractory to conservative therapy. Proper patient selection and objective assessment of their current condition increase the effectiveness of this method. In addition to improving pathological muscle tone, epidural stimulation also alleviates pain.

Physical and rehabilitation medicine medical rehabilitationVol. 7(1)
Research Institute of Emergency Childrens Surgery and Traumatology (RU), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Orthopaedic Trauma Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.