Financial development and growth volatility revisited

This paper examines the relationship between financial development and macroeconomic growth volatility. Using data from 104 countries over the period 1980–2023 and employing endogeneity-robust estimation techniques, we find that financial intermediation, along with access, depth, and efficiency of financial institutions and markets, generally reduces growth volatility in the long run. However, this effect is non-monotonic, implying that too much finance might actually exacerbate growth volatility. Furthermore, we show that the relationship between financial development and growth volatility has weakened over time and that there is no significant association between finance and growth volatility in the short run. • Financial development has a negative long-run effect on growth volatility. • The relationship is non-monotonic, with too much finance exacerbating volatility. • The link between financial development and growth volatility has recently weakened. • Financial development has no significant short-run impact on growth volatility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107175
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial development and growth volatility revisited

Philipp Struthmann
6 citations
Finance research letters
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
18.51
article

Financial development and growth volatility revisited

Philipp Struthmann
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between financial development and macroeconomic growth volatility. Using data from 104 countries over the period 1980–2023 and employing endogeneity-robust estimation techniques, we find that financial intermediation, along with access, depth, and efficiency of financial institutions and markets, generally reduces growth volatility in the long run. However, this effect is non-monotonic, implying that too much finance might actually exacerbate growth volatility. Furthermore, we show that the relationship between financial development and growth volatility has weakened over time and that there is no significant association between finance and growth volatility in the short run. • Financial development has a negative long-run effect on growth volatility. • The relationship is non-monotonic, with too much finance exacerbating volatility. • The link between financial development and growth volatility has recently weakened. • Financial development has no significant short-run impact on growth volatility.

Finance research lettersVol. 78
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
18.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Financial development and growth volatility revisited — Philipp Struthmann · Finance research letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS