Savings goals matter–Cognitive constraints, retirement planning, and downstream economic behaviors

We study how cognitive constraints relate to each distinct step of the planning and execution process for retirement, that is, individuals’ propensity to plan, savings goals set, and economic outcomes (wealth accumulation and portfolio choice). We find that different cognitive constraints play distinct roles: Higher advanced financial literacy (and quantitative reasoning ability) predicts a greater propensity to plan, while higher basic financial literacy and verbal cognition predict setting higher savings goals. Math-related abilities are not associated with savings goals in a systematic way. Furthermore, our evidence shows that the economic consequences of retirement planning depend on the earlier set savings goals. In comparison to non-planners, only planners with a higher savings goal (above the median) accumulate more wealth and are more likely to hold risky assets and private annuities. Our findings suggest that when crafting public policy to develop individuals’ retirement readiness, next to improving financial literacy, other targets could be to enhance cognitive skills and to support setting concrete savings goals by, for example, providing better access to planning relevant information and tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2025.101042
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Savings goals matter–Cognitive constraints, retirement planning, and downstream economic behaviors

Thomas Post, Shenglan Chen, Xiaopeng Zou, Zihan Ye
3 citations
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
11.73
article

Savings goals matter–Cognitive constraints, retirement planning, and downstream economic behaviors

Thomas Post, Shenglan Chen, Xiaopeng Zou, Zihan Ye
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We study how cognitive constraints relate to each distinct step of the planning and execution process for retirement, that is, individuals’ propensity to plan, savings goals set, and economic outcomes (wealth accumulation and portfolio choice). We find that different cognitive constraints play distinct roles: Higher advanced financial literacy (and quantitative reasoning ability) predicts a greater propensity to plan, while higher basic financial literacy and verbal cognition predict setting higher savings goals. Math-related abilities are not associated with savings goals in a systematic way. Furthermore, our evidence shows that the economic consequences of retirement planning depend on the earlier set savings goals. In comparison to non-planners, only planners with a higher savings goal (above the median) accumulate more wealth and are more likely to hold risky assets and private annuities. Our findings suggest that when crafting public policy to develop individuals’ retirement readiness, next to improving financial literacy, other targets could be to enhance cognitive skills and to support setting concrete savings goals by, for example, providing better access to planning relevant information and tools.

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental FinanceVol. 46
Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement (NL), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.