Expanding the Recovery Experience Questionnaire into a 5-factor model by including a factor covering experiences of contrast

For decades, research on stress recovery has been neglected, as reflected in the underdevelopment of instruments measuring recovery processes. Nevertheless, a notable exception is the Recovery Experience Questionnaire (REQ) developed by Sonnentag and Fritz, which assesses work recovery experiences during leisure time. The REQ has demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity across multiple languages. In this study, we used the Swedish version of the REQ to investigate whether a factor covering experiences of contrast between work time and non-work time could be incorporated as a fifth factor into the established four-factor model of the REQ, which currently includes the factors control, relaxation, mastery, and psychological detachment. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using a sample of 812 participants recruited through social media. Utilizing four questions as indicators of contrasting experiences, all fit indices suggested a satisfactory model fit, closely resembling those of the four-factor model. Moreover, indices of reliability and validity indicated good composite reliability, internal convergent validity, and discriminant validity for all five factors. Among the five recovery factors, experiences of contrast exhibited the weakest relationship with both burnout and vitality. In conclusion, despite certain limitations in the present study, further examination of experiences of contrast as a recovery factor and the inclusion of this factor in the initial Swedish version of the 5-factor REQ are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Psychology
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2025.2472633
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expanding the Recovery Experience Questionnaire into a 5-factor model by including a factor covering experiences of contrast

Niclas Almén, Simon Ekström, Billy Jansson, Olivia Grytzelius
Nordic Psychology
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

Expanding the Recovery Experience Questionnaire into a 5-factor model by including a factor covering experiences of contrast

Niclas Almén, Simon Ekström, Billy Jansson, Olivia Grytzelius
article en

Abstract

For decades, research on stress recovery has been neglected, as reflected in the underdevelopment of instruments measuring recovery processes. Nevertheless, a notable exception is the Recovery Experience Questionnaire (REQ) developed by Sonnentag and Fritz, which assesses work recovery experiences during leisure time. The REQ has demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity across multiple languages. In this study, we used the Swedish version of the REQ to investigate whether a factor covering experiences of contrast between work time and non-work time could be incorporated as a fifth factor into the established four-factor model of the REQ, which currently includes the factors control, relaxation, mastery, and psychological detachment. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using a sample of 812 participants recruited through social media. Utilizing four questions as indicators of contrasting experiences, all fit indices suggested a satisfactory model fit, closely resembling those of the four-factor model. Moreover, indices of reliability and validity indicated good composite reliability, internal convergent validity, and discriminant validity for all five factors. Among the five recovery factors, experiences of contrast exhibited the weakest relationship with both burnout and vitality. In conclusion, despite certain limitations in the present study, further examination of experiences of contrast as a recovery factor and the inclusion of this factor in the initial Swedish version of the 5-factor REQ are warranted.

Nordic PsychologyVol. 78(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Mid Sweden University (SE)
Mittuniversitetet
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.