Evaluation of Building Materials Course in Architectural Education

In architecture, many fundamental topics—such as construction, comfort, health, safety, durability, lifecycle, environment, climate change, cost, reuse, and recycling—are rooted in "building materials." Despite this, it can be observed that the current architectural field lacks sufficient competence in building materials, both in education and professional practice. In architectural education, where the goal is to develop abstract and concrete thinking skills, the course that lays the foundation for abstract thinking is "basic design," while the course that explores the possibilities of translating abstract ideas into concrete forms is "building materials." Although these courses are complementary, their teaching methods and outcomes differ. This study aims to identify the quality of building materials courses, defining existing issues of building materials courses in contemporary architectural education and propose solutions. The scope of the research includes the curricula of "Building Materials" and "Basic Design" courses in the architecture departments of 33 state universities in Turkey, selected based on various criteria. The research design combines quantitative and qualitative analysis methods.In the quantitative analysis, factors such as the mandatory status of courses, their inclusion of practical components, class hours, and the adequacy of practical training hours were evaluated. The qualitative analysis involved interviews with instructors of building materials courses, which are delivered as a combination of theory and practice, to gain insights into the content and methods of practical training. The findings highlight a major issue: building materials courses lack a contemporary learning approach and method, instead relying on a traditional model where the instructor is active and the student remains passive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLANARCH - Design and Planning Research
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54864/planarch.1554347
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Building Materials Course in Architectural Education

Çiğdem Teki̇n, Halit Beyaztaş
PLANARCH - Design and Planning Research
Design Education and Practice
article

Evaluation of Building Materials Course in Architectural Education

Çiğdem Teki̇n, Halit Beyaztaş
article en

Abstract

In architecture, many fundamental topics—such as construction, comfort, health, safety, durability, lifecycle, environment, climate change, cost, reuse, and recycling—are rooted in "building materials." Despite this, it can be observed that the current architectural field lacks sufficient competence in building materials, both in education and professional practice. In architectural education, where the goal is to develop abstract and concrete thinking skills, the course that lays the foundation for abstract thinking is "basic design," while the course that explores the possibilities of translating abstract ideas into concrete forms is "building materials." Although these courses are complementary, their teaching methods and outcomes differ. This study aims to identify the quality of building materials courses, defining existing issues of building materials courses in contemporary architectural education and propose solutions. The scope of the research includes the curricula of "Building Materials" and "Basic Design" courses in the architecture departments of 33 state universities in Turkey, selected based on various criteria. The research design combines quantitative and qualitative analysis methods.In the quantitative analysis, factors such as the mandatory status of courses, their inclusion of practical components, class hours, and the adequacy of practical training hours were evaluated. The qualitative analysis involved interviews with instructors of building materials courses, which are delivered as a combination of theory and practice, to gain insights into the content and methods of practical training. The findings highlight a major issue: building materials courses lack a contemporary learning approach and method, instead relying on a traditional model where the instructor is active and the student remains passive.

PLANARCH - Design and Planning ResearchVol. 9(1)
Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Building Materials Course in Architectural Education — Çiğdem Teki̇n, Halit Beyaztaş · PLANARCH - Design and Planning Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS