Identifying actionable statements in Chinese health guidelines: a cross-sectional study
Up to date, the Chinese guideline developers tend to overestimate the number of formal recommendations and underestimate the number of GPS, remarks, research only recommendations, implementation considerations, tools and tips, and informal recommendations. Thus the current quality of actionable statements in Chinese health guidelines requires further enhancement.
Authors
- Tamara Lotfi
- Siyuan Ruan
- Xiaomei Yao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-2607)
- Shichun Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7409-9363)
- Siyu Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7029-6861)
- Chenghu Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3331-2302)
- Wei Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5292-7308)
- Qiyi Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0689-9489)
- Xiangying Ren
- Holger J. Schünemann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-8479)
- Jiyu Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7006-6430)
- Wanru Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-3660)
- Yuling Lei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-5669)
- Yongbo Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-9453)
- Qiao Huang
- Yinghui Jin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-9581)
Institutions
- Humanitas University (IT)
- Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN)
- Children's Hospital of Fudan University (CN)
- Cochrane (CA)
- Impact (CA)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ evidence-based medicine
- Published
- 2025-03-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113050
- Primary Topic
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China