AGROCHEMICAL PARADIGM: ARGUMENTS AND CONSEQUENCES

The article based on the analysis of the arguments of representatives of the agrochemical paradigm of agriculture shows that these arguments do not meet the criterion of Leibniz. In the form of expression, these arguments are close to the techniques of participants in eristic discussions. As a result, people whose professional skills do not include studies of natural phenomena gives the impression of the logic of the arguments of agricultural chemists and the usefulness of the use of chemical fertilizers. Therefore, the managers of the state and its citizens, who are not researchers of the agricultural sphere and the causes of problems with the production of food, are forced to put up with diseases, an increase in the threat of hunger and wars and extinction. Question: Do such arguments turn all citizens of the state into a sacrifice of agrarian policy adopted in the state as a scientific and technical policy leading to the destruction of natural soil fertility of land, and turning this policy into a world scientific and constituent trap to eliminate civilizations? Answer: “turns.”