Sentential interpretative adverbs: grammatical and pragmatic features in contrast to predicatives

The article examines the functional interaction of predicatives and adverbs ending in -o which formally adjoin the verb, but semantically characterise the entire sentence (sentential adverbs). The research focused on lexemes expressing socio-ethical (bestaktno, egoistichno / English tactlessly, selfishly) and rationalistic (oshibochno, netselesoobrazno / English erroneously, inappropriately) evaluation of individuals’ actions. The functioning of 50 adverbs with both types of use, namely predicative and sentential, was investigated. As for constructions with predicatives, the study only examined sentences with dependent infinitives (Nechestno skryvat’ eto ot menya / English It is unfair to hide it from me). The research methods included transformational analysis, contextual analysis, and analytical description. The article argues that a sentential interpretative adverb can be embedded in a sentence (proposition) denoting not only a fact (a performed action), but also a possibility. Additionally, the study demonstrates the acceptability of statements in which such adverbs adjoin verbs in the forms of the future tense, the subjunctive mood with a conditional, sometimes desiderative semantics, and also in some cases the imperative mood, and so on. Pragmatic strategies that determine the use of sentential adverbs in the specified contexts of resolved affirmativeness are identified. The article notes grammatical and communicative differences between sentences with predicatives and sentential adverbs. For instance, the standard rhematic emphasis of the predicative enables it to foreground the interpretation rather than the situation being evaluated. Conversely, the sentential adverb does not normally act as an emphasis carrier. It is shown that the difference in the communicative organisation of utterances with the grammatical units under study prevents their interchangeability if the syntactic structure requires interpretative component (de)actualization. For example, for a sentential adverb, the position of the interrogative statement component with a focus on evaluation is closed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian language at school
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2025-86-2-74-85
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentential interpretative adverbs: grammatical and pragmatic features in contrast to predicatives

Viktoria Golubeva
Russian language at school
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Sentential interpretative adverbs: grammatical and pragmatic features in contrast to predicatives

Viktoria Golubeva
article en

Abstract

The article examines the functional interaction of predicatives and adverbs ending in -o which formally adjoin the verb, but semantically characterise the entire sentence (sentential adverbs). The research focused on lexemes expressing socio-ethical (bestaktno, egoistichno / English tactlessly, selfishly) and rationalistic (oshibochno, netselesoobrazno / English erroneously, inappropriately) evaluation of individuals’ actions. The functioning of 50 adverbs with both types of use, namely predicative and sentential, was investigated. As for constructions with predicatives, the study only examined sentences with dependent infinitives (Nechestno skryvat’ eto ot menya / English It is unfair to hide it from me). The research methods included transformational analysis, contextual analysis, and analytical description. The article argues that a sentential interpretative adverb can be embedded in a sentence (proposition) denoting not only a fact (a performed action), but also a possibility. Additionally, the study demonstrates the acceptability of statements in which such adverbs adjoin verbs in the forms of the future tense, the subjunctive mood with a conditional, sometimes desiderative semantics, and also in some cases the imperative mood, and so on. Pragmatic strategies that determine the use of sentential adverbs in the specified contexts of resolved affirmativeness are identified. The article notes grammatical and communicative differences between sentences with predicatives and sentential adverbs. For instance, the standard rhematic emphasis of the predicative enables it to foreground the interpretation rather than the situation being evaluated. Conversely, the sentential adverb does not normally act as an emphasis carrier. It is shown that the difference in the communicative organisation of utterances with the grammatical units under study prevents their interchangeability if the syntactic structure requires interpretative component (de)actualization. For example, for a sentential adverb, the position of the interrogative statement component with a focus on evaluation is closed.

Russian language at schoolVol. 86(2)
Belarusian State University (BY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sentential interpretative adverbs: grammatical and pragmatic features in contrast to predicatives — Viktoria Golubeva · Russian language at school (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS