Inter-minority Relations: Factors Shaping Cognitive and Affective Intergroup Attitudes between Asian and Black Americans

Abstract Rising anti-Asian racism and the recent police killings of unarmed Black people have called attention to how Asian and Black Americans experience racism and how they perceive one another. Using data from a recent national sample of Asian (n = 1078) and Black Americans (n = 367), we explored socio-demographic (demographic, socioeconomic, political, and immigration) as well as group-relevant predictors of intergroup attitudes between Asian and Black Americans. Measures of intergroup attitudes included feelings of warmth and negative outgroup sentiment. Regression analyses showed that income, educational attainment level, employment status, immigration status, gender, age, ethnicity, political ideology, and political party affiliation were significant socio-demographic predictors of Asian Americans’ attitudes toward Black Americans. In contrast, only age and ethnicity emerged as significant socio-demographic predictors of Black Americans’ attitudes toward Asian Americans. The explanatory power of beliefs about group relations–such as endorsement of zero-sum, nationalist, and oppressed minority ideologies–as well as the degree of intergroup contact was quite strong for predicting intergroup attitudes for both groups. The findings reveal the complexity behind Asian-Black intergroup dynamics and highlight pathways and barriers toward cultivating more positive attitudes and intergroup relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Problems
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spae075
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-minority Relations: Factors Shaping Cognitive and Affective Intergroup Attitudes between Asian and Black Americans

Doris F. Chang, Maureen A. Craig, Sumie Okazaki, Harvey L. Nicholson et al.
5 citations
Social Problems
Social and Intergroup Psychology
21.01
article

Inter-minority Relations: Factors Shaping Cognitive and Affective Intergroup Attitudes between Asian and Black Americans

Doris F. Chang, Maureen A. Craig, Sumie Okazaki, Harvey L. Nicholson, Nari Yoo
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Rising anti-Asian racism and the recent police killings of unarmed Black people have called attention to how Asian and Black Americans experience racism and how they perceive one another. Using data from a recent national sample of Asian (n = 1078) and Black Americans (n = 367), we explored socio-demographic (demographic, socioeconomic, political, and immigration) as well as group-relevant predictors of intergroup attitudes between Asian and Black Americans. Measures of intergroup attitudes included feelings of warmth and negative outgroup sentiment. Regression analyses showed that income, educational attainment level, employment status, immigration status, gender, age, ethnicity, political ideology, and political party affiliation were significant socio-demographic predictors of Asian Americans’ attitudes toward Black Americans. In contrast, only age and ethnicity emerged as significant socio-demographic predictors of Black Americans’ attitudes toward Asian Americans. The explanatory power of beliefs about group relations–such as endorsement of zero-sum, nationalist, and oppressed minority ideologies–as well as the degree of intergroup contact was quite strong for predicting intergroup attitudes for both groups. The findings reveal the complexity behind Asian-Black intergroup dynamics and highlight pathways and barriers toward cultivating more positive attitudes and intergroup relations.

Social Problems
Hofstra University (US), Duke University (US), University of Toronto (CA), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
21.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.