Policyholders’ subjective beliefs: approaching new drivers of insurance ESG reputational risk

Abstract Firms, insurance companies, pension funds, and broadly speaking the international community focus already their engagement activities on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues since it can create long-term shareholder value, by determining the future performance of markets. Indeed ESG criteria adoption has multiple positive dimensions and outcomes, meanwhile, the analysis of the risks related to sustainability is already uncommon. In this paper, we provide a formal theoretical valuation system on ESG reputation, i.e., the reputation or the gain in confidence produced by possession of a positive reputation compared to the lack of one when the ESG criteria are integrated into the business analysis. In particular, we model the ESG reputational risk by means of the paradigms of behavioural finance. We define the ESG reputational risk by subjective probabilities framed in a probability function based on preferences set of the potential trustees, such as actors or objects in whom others may seek to place trust. Furthermore, we compute the sustainability premium or discount, which measures the economic impact of the good or bad reputation due to ESG investments. One of the approach’s main features is the flexibility coming from the opportunity to assign a given analytical form of the utility function describing the trustor’s preferences. From an operational point of view, our results should encourage the firms and other institutions to accurately evaluate the reputational risks related to ESG investments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Decisions in Economics and Finance
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-025-00516-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policyholders’ subjective beliefs: approaching new drivers of insurance ESG reputational risk

Valeria D’Amato, Giovanna Apicella, Maria Carannante
2 citations
Decisions in Economics and Finance
Risk Perception and Management
8.40
article

Policyholders’ subjective beliefs: approaching new drivers of insurance ESG reputational risk

Valeria D’Amato, Giovanna Apicella, Maria Carannante
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Firms, insurance companies, pension funds, and broadly speaking the international community focus already their engagement activities on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues since it can create long-term shareholder value, by determining the future performance of markets. Indeed ESG criteria adoption has multiple positive dimensions and outcomes, meanwhile, the analysis of the risks related to sustainability is already uncommon. In this paper, we provide a formal theoretical valuation system on ESG reputation, i.e., the reputation or the gain in confidence produced by possession of a positive reputation compared to the lack of one when the ESG criteria are integrated into the business analysis. In particular, we model the ESG reputational risk by means of the paradigms of behavioural finance. We define the ESG reputational risk by subjective probabilities framed in a probability function based on preferences set of the potential trustees, such as actors or objects in whom others may seek to place trust. Furthermore, we compute the sustainability premium or discount, which measures the economic impact of the good or bad reputation due to ESG investments. One of the approach’s main features is the flexibility coming from the opportunity to assign a given analytical form of the utility function describing the trustor’s preferences. From an operational point of view, our results should encourage the firms and other institutions to accurately evaluate the reputational risks related to ESG investments.

Decisions in Economics and Finance
University of Udine (IT), Parthenope University of Naples (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Risk Perception and Management
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Policyholders’ subjective beliefs: approaching new drivers of insurance ESG reputational risk — Valeria D’Amato, Giovanna Apicella, et al. · Decisions in Economics and Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS