Examining Effects of Agricultural Micro Finance on Household Maize Output for Small Scale Farmers: A Case Study of Chongwe District

This study examines the effects of agricultural microfinance on maize productivity among smallholder farmers in Chongwe District, Zambia. The main objectives of the study are to assess the impact of agricultural microfinance on household maize output, identify the barriers hindering access to microfinance, and explore factors that can increase access to microfinance and enhance maize productivity. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining both qualitative and quantitative research designs. A survey was conducted among 50 smallholder farmers in Chongwe District, selected through a stratified random sampling method to ensure a representative sample. Data collection involved structured interviews, focus group discussions, and direct observations to gather both numerical and qualitative insights from the respondents. The study also incorporated secondary data from relevant reports on agricultural microfinance and maize production in the region. Data analysis was performed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic characteristics and responses, while inferential statistics helped identify significant relationships between microfinance access and maize productivity. The qualitative data were analyzed thematically to highlight key issues such as barriers to microfinance access and recommendations for improving financial inclusion in the agricultural sector. The results of the study reveal that agricultural microfinance has a positive effect on maize productivity, with 72% of farmers who had access to microfinance reporting higher yields compared to 28% of those who did not have access. Additionally, 65% of the farmers reported an overall improvement in their economic well-being due to increased maize productivity. However, several factors hinder access to microfinance, including high interest rates (42%) of respondents), complex loan application processes (38%), limited financial literacy (30%), and inadequate access to information (25%). The study also identified key factors that could increase access to agricultural microfinance, such as the use of mobile banking services (58% of respondents), agricultural insurance (40%), government support (55%), training (48%), and collaboration with cooperatives (62%). Based on the findings, the study recommends that policymakers and financial institutions work together to simplify loan application processes, lower interest rates, and provide financial literacy training. Furthermore, the integration of mobile banking services and agricultural insurance schemes could improve access to microfinance, thereby enhancing maize productivity for smallholder farmers in Chongwe District.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2025.5.2.3842
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Effects of Agricultural Micro Finance on Household Maize Output for Small Scale Farmers: A Case Study of Chongwe District

Kelvin Chibomba, Manesi Simunene
1 citations
International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
article

Examining Effects of Agricultural Micro Finance on Household Maize Output for Small Scale Farmers: A Case Study of Chongwe District

Kelvin Chibomba, Manesi Simunene
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the effects of agricultural microfinance on maize productivity among smallholder farmers in Chongwe District, Zambia. The main objectives of the study are to assess the impact of agricultural microfinance on household maize output, identify the barriers hindering access to microfinance, and explore factors that can increase access to microfinance and enhance maize productivity. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining both qualitative and quantitative research designs. A survey was conducted among 50 smallholder farmers in Chongwe District, selected through a stratified random sampling method to ensure a representative sample. Data collection involved structured interviews, focus group discussions, and direct observations to gather both numerical and qualitative insights from the respondents. The study also incorporated secondary data from relevant reports on agricultural microfinance and maize production in the region. Data analysis was performed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic characteristics and responses, while inferential statistics helped identify significant relationships between microfinance access and maize productivity. The qualitative data were analyzed thematically to highlight key issues such as barriers to microfinance access and recommendations for improving financial inclusion in the agricultural sector. The results of the study reveal that agricultural microfinance has a positive effect on maize productivity, with 72% of farmers who had access to microfinance reporting higher yields compared to 28% of those who did not have access. Additionally, 65% of the farmers reported an overall improvement in their economic well-being due to increased maize productivity. However, several factors hinder access to microfinance, including high interest rates (42%) of respondents), complex loan application processes (38%), limited financial literacy (30%), and inadequate access to information (25%). The study also identified key factors that could increase access to agricultural microfinance, such as the use of mobile banking services (58% of respondents), agricultural insurance (40%), government support (55%), training (48%), and collaboration with cooperatives (62%). Based on the findings, the study recommends that policymakers and financial institutions work together to simplify loan application processes, lower interest rates, and provide financial literacy training. Furthermore, the integration of mobile banking services and agricultural insurance schemes could improve access to microfinance, thereby enhancing maize productivity for smallholder farmers in Chongwe District.

International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and StudiesVol. 5(2)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.