Why do people object to economic inequality? The role of distributive justice and social harmony concerns as predictors of support for redistribution and collective action

People may perceive economic inequality through moral lens, focusing on the unfair distribution of resources, or as a threat to their personal and social environment. This research examines how justice- and threat-based concerns shape reactions to economic inequality. In Study 1 (N = 358), we identify elements of inequality perceived as unjust or threatening and explore how these are organized into meaningful clusters using network analysis. We identified four overarching concerns: distributive justice, social harmony, inequality of opportunities and economic threats. Distributive justice and social harmony concerns were the most prominent, associated with perceptions of injustice and threat, respectively. Study 2 (N = 260) showed that distributive justice (but not social harmony) concerns were positively associated with collective action and support for redistribution. In Study 3 (N = 1536), perceived economic inequality was positively related to both concerns, but only distributive justice concerns consistently mediated the relationship between perceived economic inequality and support for measures to reduce inequality. In Study 4 (N = 214) exposure to distributive justice concerns, compared to social harmony and control conditions, increased support for taxing the rich and assisting the poor. Results suggest that framing economic inequality as a justice issue effectively promotes social change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12877
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why do people object to economic inequality? The role of distributive justice and social harmony concerns as predictors of support for redistribution and collective action

Katerina Petkanopoulou, Efraín García‐Sánchez, Filyra Vlastou‐Dimopoulou, Artemis‐Margarita Griva et al.
1 citations
British Journal of Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Why do people object to economic inequality? The role of distributive justice and social harmony concerns as predictors of support for redistribution and collective action

Katerina Petkanopoulou, Efraín García‐Sánchez, Filyra Vlastou‐Dimopoulou, Artemis‐Margarita Griva, Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, Konstantinos Christos Daoultzis, Guillermo Byrd Willis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

People may perceive economic inequality through moral lens, focusing on the unfair distribution of resources, or as a threat to their personal and social environment. This research examines how justice- and threat-based concerns shape reactions to economic inequality. In Study 1 (N = 358), we identify elements of inequality perceived as unjust or threatening and explore how these are organized into meaningful clusters using network analysis. We identified four overarching concerns: distributive justice, social harmony, inequality of opportunities and economic threats. Distributive justice and social harmony concerns were the most prominent, associated with perceptions of injustice and threat, respectively. Study 2 (N = 260) showed that distributive justice (but not social harmony) concerns were positively associated with collective action and support for redistribution. In Study 3 (N = 1536), perceived economic inequality was positively related to both concerns, but only distributive justice concerns consistently mediated the relationship between perceived economic inequality and support for measures to reduce inequality. In Study 4 (N = 214) exposure to distributive justice concerns, compared to social harmony and control conditions, increased support for taxing the rich and assisting the poor. Results suggest that framing economic inequality as a justice issue effectively promotes social change.

British Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 64(2)
University of Crete (GR), Universidad de Granada (ES), National Technical University of Athens (GR), Panteion University (GR), Crete University Press (GR), Stanford University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.