Can Course Design and Language Competence Contribute to the Understanding of Literature for EFL Students? A Case Study at a Saudi Arabian University

<p>Teaching literature without a prerequisite in a Saudi Arabian University curriculum for EFL students revealed a variety of impediments, including a lack of critical and analytical skills, ambiguity tolerance issues, and a low level of English proficiency. This research aims to examine the course limitations and assessments and provide a development strategy to improve those key skills. As a result, the study separated the topic into numerous questions that constitute the primary axes the research aims to address. The first question is whether the existing course design, ENG280 Introduction to Literature, is appropriate for level 4 students. The second question concerns whether a prerequisite should be included in the academic plan. The final question concerns how students' English proficiency affects their understanding of the course. Methodological triangulation is used to address these questions appropriately. The utilization of both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods provides the availability of high-quality data required to improve the findings. The data was collected using a lecturer's questionnaire and an English language competence test. The language competence test is aligned with the 2020 edition of the Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR). The study highlighted flaws in the course design and assessments, including advanced skill expectations that were inappropriate for fourth-level students' linguistic and skill capabilities. As a result, the study provides developmental suggestions for course design and assessments that can successfully address issues connected to students' linguistic and literary abilities. Implementing the improvement plan will simultaneously enhance the students’ linguistic level and develop their critical analysis abilities. Students will also have sufficient time and diverse assessment methods that align with their linguistic and literary capabilities, providing them with encouragement and motivation to learn.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v7i2.22552
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Course Design and Language Competence Contribute to the Understanding of Literature for EFL Students? A Case Study at a Saudi Arabian University

Rabab Ahmed Amin AbdelFattah
Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Can Course Design and Language Competence Contribute to the Understanding of Literature for EFL Students? A Case Study at a Saudi Arabian University

Rabab Ahmed Amin AbdelFattah
article en

Abstract

<p>Teaching literature without a prerequisite in a Saudi Arabian University curriculum for EFL students revealed a variety of impediments, including a lack of critical and analytical skills, ambiguity tolerance issues, and a low level of English proficiency. This research aims to examine the course limitations and assessments and provide a development strategy to improve those key skills. As a result, the study separated the topic into numerous questions that constitute the primary axes the research aims to address. The first question is whether the existing course design, ENG280 Introduction to Literature, is appropriate for level 4 students. The second question concerns whether a prerequisite should be included in the academic plan. The final question concerns how students' English proficiency affects their understanding of the course. Methodological triangulation is used to address these questions appropriately. The utilization of both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods provides the availability of high-quality data required to improve the findings. The data was collected using a lecturer's questionnaire and an English language competence test. The language competence test is aligned with the 2020 edition of the Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR). The study highlighted flaws in the course design and assessments, including advanced skill expectations that were inappropriate for fourth-level students' linguistic and skill capabilities. As a result, the study provides developmental suggestions for course design and assessments that can successfully address issues connected to students' linguistic and literary abilities. Implementing the improvement plan will simultaneously enhance the students’ linguistic level and develop their critical analysis abilities. Students will also have sufficient time and diverse assessment methods that align with their linguistic and literary capabilities, providing them with encouragement and motivation to learn.</p>

Journal of English Teaching and Learning IssuesVol. 7(2)
Qassim University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.