A novel assessment framework for colored-water footprint inequality in China

• Created a novel model for assessing the inequality of colored-water footprint allocation. • The transfer characteristics of the colored-water footprint across various provinces and sectors are elucidated. • Quantified the distribution and transfer of colored-water footprint through MRIO model. • The Gini coefficient and Imbalance index were utilized to gauge the inequality of colored-water footprint allocation. • The Primacy Index was introduced to quantify the concentration of colored-water footprint allocation. This study establishes a novel model capable of diagnosing the inequality of China’s colored-water footprint (CWF) allocation through a multi-dimensional perspective for the years 2012, 2015, and 2017. The results indicate the following: (1) The grey water footprint ( WF grey ) exceeds both the blue water footprint ( WF blue ) and the green water footprint ( WF green ). Provinces with higher CWF values are primarily located in the central, eastern, and southern geographical regions of China. (2) Provinces with substantial CWF outflow are primarily those with high GDP or extensive agricultural production, such as Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shandong, Henan, Zhejiang, and Sichuan. The sectors contributing most to net CWF outflows are agriculture and industry. (3) Although the Gini coefficients for CWF and socio-economic factors all remain below the warning threshold of 0.4, the Imbalance indices deviate significantly from the absolute balance line in most provinces, except for the WF green -population. Additionally, the Gini coefficient of water stress index (WSI) (0.608 ∼ 0.703) is substantially higher than that of CWF (0.000 ∼ 0.327). (4) The CWF Primacy Index for all provinces is significantly below the ideal level, indicating a polycentric spatial structure for CWF distribution across China. These findings offer valuable scientific insights for informing equitable CWF distribution strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113350
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel assessment framework for colored-water footprint inequality in China

Yu Song, Xiaoling Li
4 citations
Ecological Indicators
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
3.20
article

A novel assessment framework for colored-water footprint inequality in China

Yu Song, Xiaoling Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Created a novel model for assessing the inequality of colored-water footprint allocation. • The transfer characteristics of the colored-water footprint across various provinces and sectors are elucidated. • Quantified the distribution and transfer of colored-water footprint through MRIO model. • The Gini coefficient and Imbalance index were utilized to gauge the inequality of colored-water footprint allocation. • The Primacy Index was introduced to quantify the concentration of colored-water footprint allocation. This study establishes a novel model capable of diagnosing the inequality of China’s colored-water footprint (CWF) allocation through a multi-dimensional perspective for the years 2012, 2015, and 2017. The results indicate the following: (1) The grey water footprint ( WF grey ) exceeds both the blue water footprint ( WF blue ) and the green water footprint ( WF green ). Provinces with higher CWF values are primarily located in the central, eastern, and southern geographical regions of China. (2) Provinces with substantial CWF outflow are primarily those with high GDP or extensive agricultural production, such as Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shandong, Henan, Zhejiang, and Sichuan. The sectors contributing most to net CWF outflows are agriculture and industry. (3) Although the Gini coefficients for CWF and socio-economic factors all remain below the warning threshold of 0.4, the Imbalance indices deviate significantly from the absolute balance line in most provinces, except for the WF green -population. Additionally, the Gini coefficient of water stress index (WSI) (0.608 ∼ 0.703) is substantially higher than that of CWF (0.000 ∼ 0.327). (4) The CWF Primacy Index for all provinces is significantly below the ideal level, indicating a polycentric spatial structure for CWF distribution across China. These findings offer valuable scientific insights for informing equitable CWF distribution strategies.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 173
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
Macau University of Science and Technology Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.