Testing the top-down feedback in the central visual field using the reversed depth illusion

In a new framework to understand vision, an information bottleneck impoverishes visual input information downstream of the primary visual cortex along the visual pathway; to aid ongoing visual recognition given the bottleneck, feedback from downstream to upstream visual stages queries for additional information. According to the central-peripheral dichotomy theory, this feedback is primarily directed to the central, rather than the peripheral, visual field. Counterintuitively, this theory predicts illusions visible only in the peripheral visual field, which lacks the feedback query to veto the illusions arising from misleading and impoverished feedforward signals. A paradigmatic example is the predicted and confirmed reversed depth illusion in random-dot stereograms. This theory further predicts that disrupting the feedback renders this illusion visible in the central visual field. We test and confirm this prediction using visual backward masking to disrupt the feedback. This feedback privilege for the central visual field underpins visual understanding through analysis-by-synthesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112223
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the top-down feedback in the central visual field using the reversed depth illusion

Li Zhaoping
5 citations
iScience
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
7.16
article

Testing the top-down feedback in the central visual field using the reversed depth illusion

Li Zhaoping
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In a new framework to understand vision, an information bottleneck impoverishes visual input information downstream of the primary visual cortex along the visual pathway; to aid ongoing visual recognition given the bottleneck, feedback from downstream to upstream visual stages queries for additional information. According to the central-peripheral dichotomy theory, this feedback is primarily directed to the central, rather than the peripheral, visual field. Counterintuitively, this theory predicts illusions visible only in the peripheral visual field, which lacks the feedback query to veto the illusions arising from misleading and impoverished feedforward signals. A paradigmatic example is the predicted and confirmed reversed depth illusion in random-dot stereograms. This theory further predicts that disrupting the feedback renders this illusion visible in the central visual field. We test and confirm this prediction using visual backward masking to disrupt the feedback. This feedback privilege for the central visual field underpins visual understanding through analysis-by-synthesis.

iScienceVol. 28(4)
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.