Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy

Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy center an analysis of power and the broad political, social, and economic landscape that enables or harms health. They must contend, however, with a dominant policy orientation focused on ensuring individual access to the existing healthcare system. This Policy Inquiry reviews the recent history of US antitrust and climate/industrial policy, both domains where policy movements taking a political economy approach have had significant and unexpected recent success, to draw lessons for health policy, in which a "care economy" movement aligned with political economy has had some momentum, but not produced major policy change. Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy should continue to build on the momentum of the care economy movement while also looking for ways to tie healthcare market reform into the shifts in industrial policy and antitrust. Across both spaces, advocates should center the building of issue networks, make connections to historically resonant political themes, and, where possible, find ways to tap into the energy of youth organizers-all strategies shared across antitrust and climate policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf008
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy

Elizabeth Popp Berman
Health Affairs Scholar
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy

Elizabeth Popp Berman
article en

Abstract

Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy center an analysis of power and the broad political, social, and economic landscape that enables or harms health. They must contend, however, with a dominant policy orientation focused on ensuring individual access to the existing healthcare system. This Policy Inquiry reviews the recent history of US antitrust and climate/industrial policy, both domains where policy movements taking a political economy approach have had significant and unexpected recent success, to draw lessons for health policy, in which a "care economy" movement aligned with political economy has had some momentum, but not produced major policy change. Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy should continue to build on the momentum of the care economy movement while also looking for ways to tie healthcare market reform into the shifts in industrial policy and antitrust. Across both spaces, advocates should center the building of issue networks, make connections to historically resonant political themes, and, where possible, find ways to tap into the energy of youth organizers-all strategies shared across antitrust and climate policy.

Health Affairs ScholarVol. 3(3)
University of Michigan (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy — Elizabeth Popp Berman · Health Affairs Scholar (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS