James Buttle Review: The Characteristics of Baseflow Resilience Across Diverse Ecohydrological Terrains

ABSTRACT The dynamic storage of aquifers is the portion of groundwater that can potentially drain to any given point along a stream to create baseflow. Baseflow typically occurs year‐round in perennial streams, though the characteristics and stability of dynamic storage are often most important to instream processes during extended dry periods (without precipitation and snowmelt) when runoff and quickflows are minimised. The term ‘baseflow resilience’ is defined for this review as the tendency of baseflow in streams to maintain a consistent volume and water quality year to year while under stress from climate variability and extremes, along with anthropogenic stressors such as water withdrawals, land use change, and water quality degradation. ‘Baseflow resilience’ has, in part, a user‐defined meaning spanning water supply and water quality variables of primary interest. Watershed characteristics that directly impact resilience can often produce non‐intuitive feedbacks that enhance some attributes of baseflow while simultaneously impairing others. For example, permeable stream corridor geology creates strong stream‐groundwater hydrologic connectivity, yet fast groundwater drainage via preferential high‐permeability flowpaths can lead to streamflow not being sustained during extended dry periods. Also, shallow groundwater sources are generally more immediately vulnerable to extreme events, warming, salinization, transpiration, and precipitation drought, compared to deeper groundwater. Yet baseflow drought in streams influenced by deeper groundwater can lag precipitation drought by years, and contaminant legacies may propagate through deep groundwater flowpaths to receiving waters for decades to centuries. Finally, irrigation withdrawals can intercept groundwater that would have drained to streams, and the application of irrigation may leach contaminants from the soil zone by unnaturally raising water tables, yet irrigation return flows can sustain baseflow and groundwater‐dependent habitats in semiarid areas. This review covers the concept of hydrologic resilience in the context of stream baseflow processes and summarises the common hydrogeological controls on, and multiscale stressors of, dynamic groundwater storage. Further, we present several quantitative metrics to assess a range of water supply to water quality baseflow characteristics using both broadly available and boutique data types, a subset of which are demonstrated using data from the Delaware River Basin, USA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70101
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

James Buttle Review: The Characteristics of Baseflow Resilience Across Diverse Ecohydrological Terrains

Lance R. Gruhn, Christian E. Torgersen, Connor P. Newman, Christopher L. Gazoorian et al.
9 citations
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
7.35
article

James Buttle Review: The Characteristics of Baseflow Resilience Across Diverse Ecohydrological Terrains

Lance R. Gruhn, Christian E. Torgersen, Connor P. Newman, Christopher L. Gazoorian, Martin A. Briggs, Joshua R. Benton, Daniel H. Doctor, David M. Rey, Brandon J. Fleming, Valérie Ouellet, Christopher P. Konrad
article en
9 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The dynamic storage of aquifers is the portion of groundwater that can potentially drain to any given point along a stream to create baseflow. Baseflow typically occurs year‐round in perennial streams, though the characteristics and stability of dynamic storage are often most important to instream processes during extended dry periods (without precipitation and snowmelt) when runoff and quickflows are minimised. The term ‘baseflow resilience’ is defined for this review as the tendency of baseflow in streams to maintain a consistent volume and water quality year to year while under stress from climate variability and extremes, along with anthropogenic stressors such as water withdrawals, land use change, and water quality degradation. ‘Baseflow resilience’ has, in part, a user‐defined meaning spanning water supply and water quality variables of primary interest. Watershed characteristics that directly impact resilience can often produce non‐intuitive feedbacks that enhance some attributes of baseflow while simultaneously impairing others. For example, permeable stream corridor geology creates strong stream‐groundwater hydrologic connectivity, yet fast groundwater drainage via preferential high‐permeability flowpaths can lead to streamflow not being sustained during extended dry periods. Also, shallow groundwater sources are generally more immediately vulnerable to extreme events, warming, salinization, transpiration, and precipitation drought, compared to deeper groundwater. Yet baseflow drought in streams influenced by deeper groundwater can lag precipitation drought by years, and contaminant legacies may propagate through deep groundwater flowpaths to receiving waters for decades to centuries. Finally, irrigation withdrawals can intercept groundwater that would have drained to streams, and the application of irrigation may leach contaminants from the soil zone by unnaturally raising water tables, yet irrigation return flows can sustain baseflow and groundwater‐dependent habitats in semiarid areas. This review covers the concept of hydrologic resilience in the context of stream baseflow processes and summarises the common hydrogeological controls on, and multiscale stressors of, dynamic groundwater storage. Further, we present several quantitative metrics to assess a range of water supply to water quality baseflow characteristics using both broadly available and boutique data types, a subset of which are demonstrated using data from the Delaware River Basin, USA.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(3)
United States Geological Survey (US), Colorado Water Science Center, Florence Bascom Geoscience Center, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Pennsylvania Water Science Center, Washington Water Science Center, New York Water Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
7.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.