“Dark Comet” 2005 VL<sub>1</sub> is Unlikely to be the Lost Soviet-era Probe Venera 2

Abstract A. Loeb &amp; R. Cloete intriguingly suggest that the near-Earth object 2005 VL 1 could be the lost Soviet probe Venera 2. Here I evaluate the plausibility of such a claim against the available data. I have re-determined the orbit of 2005 VL 1 (including a non-gravitational acceleration component) using the astrometric observations retrieved from the Minor Planet Center database. By propagating the orbit of 2005 VL 1 over the period of the Venera 2 mission, I compare this object’s distance from the Earth and from Venus at the times of the probe’s launch and flyby with Venus, respectively. My analysis, which takes into account realistic uncertainties on both the orbit of 2005 VL 1 and the position of Venera 2, decisively rules out the proposed identification. My approach relies entirely on open-source software and publicly available data, and could represent a viable method to assess similar claims in the future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Notes of the AAS
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/adbf9a
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Dark Comet” 2005 VL1 is Unlikely to be the Lost Soviet-era Probe Venera 2

F. Spada
Research Notes of the AAS
Astro and Planetary Science
article

“Dark Comet” 2005 VL1 is Unlikely to be the Lost Soviet-era Probe Venera 2

F. Spada
article en

Abstract

Abstract A. Loeb &amp; R. Cloete intriguingly suggest that the near-Earth object 2005 VL 1 could be the lost Soviet probe Venera 2. Here I evaluate the plausibility of such a claim against the available data. I have re-determined the orbit of 2005 VL 1 (including a non-gravitational acceleration component) using the astrometric observations retrieved from the Minor Planet Center database. By propagating the orbit of 2005 VL 1 over the period of the Venera 2 mission, I compare this object’s distance from the Earth and from Venus at the times of the probe’s launch and flyby with Venus, respectively. My analysis, which takes into account realistic uncertainties on both the orbit of 2005 VL 1 and the position of Venera 2, decisively rules out the proposed identification. My approach relies entirely on open-source software and publicly available data, and could represent a viable method to assess similar claims in the future.

Research Notes of the AASVol. 9(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.