Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe

Since low-carbon transitions require significant reorientations of financial flows, there is increasing interest in institutional investors (such as pension funds and insurance companies), which are seen as potential providers of long-term ‘patient capital’. While previous research has addressed topics like divestment from fossil fuels, investment in renewable energy, and barriers to change, there are calls in the literature for more integrated analyses. Responding to these calls, this paper analyses the multiple low-carbon reorientation strategies of seven leading institutional investors in Norway, Sweden, and the UK from 2012 to 2021. Using the Multi-Level Perspective to frame the research and understanding finance as a separate regime, we conceptualize low-carbon reorientation as involving a shift in institutional investments from fossil fuel regimes towards green niche-innovations. Drawing on fund analysis, interviews, and document analysis, the analysis consequently focuses on three strategies with the following findings: 1) funds are divesting from coal but holding on to oil companies, 2) investments in renewable energy firms increased significantly in recent years, 3) several funds also increased their direct investments in renewable energy projects, which is a novel finding. We conclude that leading institutional investors are reorienting in low-carbon directions, but that several financial regime rules (like prescribed capital allocation requirements and stock market indices) lead to continued oil lock-ins. Extending previous analyses of institutional investors with more recent data of lead firms, the paper thus finds more engagement with some dimensions of low-carbon transitions but also ongoing path dependence in others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104031
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe

Ken McPhail, Frank W. Geels, Niklas Kreander
7 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Private Equity and Venture Capital
23.46
article

Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe

Ken McPhail, Frank W. Geels, Niklas Kreander
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Since low-carbon transitions require significant reorientations of financial flows, there is increasing interest in institutional investors (such as pension funds and insurance companies), which are seen as potential providers of long-term ‘patient capital’. While previous research has addressed topics like divestment from fossil fuels, investment in renewable energy, and barriers to change, there are calls in the literature for more integrated analyses. Responding to these calls, this paper analyses the multiple low-carbon reorientation strategies of seven leading institutional investors in Norway, Sweden, and the UK from 2012 to 2021. Using the Multi-Level Perspective to frame the research and understanding finance as a separate regime, we conceptualize low-carbon reorientation as involving a shift in institutional investments from fossil fuel regimes towards green niche-innovations. Drawing on fund analysis, interviews, and document analysis, the analysis consequently focuses on three strategies with the following findings: 1) funds are divesting from coal but holding on to oil companies, 2) investments in renewable energy firms increased significantly in recent years, 3) several funds also increased their direct investments in renewable energy projects, which is a novel finding. We conclude that leading institutional investors are reorienting in low-carbon directions, but that several financial regime rules (like prescribed capital allocation requirements and stock market indices) lead to continued oil lock-ins. Extending previous analyses of institutional investors with more recent data of lead firms, the paper thus finds more engagement with some dimensions of low-carbon transitions but also ongoing path dependence in others.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 123
University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
23.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.