Primary school students' profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources—Transitions and association with self-regulatory efficacy

This study investigated stability and changes in primary school students' (N = 345) profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources including mastery and vicarious experience, social persuasion, and psychological and emotional arousal within one school year, and how profile memberships associate with gender, support for learning, and self-regulatory efficacy. Latent profile and transition analyses identified four profiles among students: Highly positive , Average , Stressed , and Highly positive but stressed . All profiles showed stability during the school year, yet some students transitioned into more maladaptive profiles. Gender was significantly associated with some profile memberships and transitions, while support for learning was not. Students who remained Highly positive showed higher self-regulatory efficacy, while students remaining in profiles showing stress reported lower levels of self-regulatory efficacy. Additionally, transitioning to a more maladaptive profile within the school year was related to lower self-regulatory efficacy. This study identified four different profiles among primary school students based on their self-regulatory efficacy sources: Highly positive , Average , Stressed , and Highly positive but stressed . Most students showed a positive combination of self-regulatory efficacy sources, but some students' profiles were more maladaptive, characterized by relatively high levels of stress. While most of the students remained in their initial profile during the school year, some transitions into maladaptive profiles did occur. These stabilities and transitions, in general, predicted students' self-regulatory efficacy, so that students showing more positive and stable profiles reported higher self-regulatory efficacy, whereas students belonging or transitioning to more stressed profiles reported lower self-regulatory efficacy. These findings suggest that experiencing stress may be harmful for student's self-efficacy, even when they otherwise have positive bases (that is, sources) for self-efficacy. • Various patterns of self-regulatory efficacy sources were identified. • Some students showed a mix of adaptive and maladaptive sources. • The profiles were highly stable, but some unfavorable transitions still occurred. • Maladaptive transitions between profiles predicted lower self-regulatory efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102675
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary school students' profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources—Transitions and association with self-regulatory efficacy

Minna Ikävalko, Jaana Viljaranta, Rebecca Lazarides, Matthew C. Lambert et al.
1 citations
Learning and Individual Differences
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
4.20
article

Primary school students' profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources—Transitions and association with self-regulatory efficacy

Minna Ikävalko, Jaana Viljaranta, Rebecca Lazarides, Matthew C. Lambert, Erkko Sointu, Anna Widlund
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigated stability and changes in primary school students' (N = 345) profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources including mastery and vicarious experience, social persuasion, and psychological and emotional arousal within one school year, and how profile memberships associate with gender, support for learning, and self-regulatory efficacy. Latent profile and transition analyses identified four profiles among students: Highly positive , Average , Stressed , and Highly positive but stressed . All profiles showed stability during the school year, yet some students transitioned into more maladaptive profiles. Gender was significantly associated with some profile memberships and transitions, while support for learning was not. Students who remained Highly positive showed higher self-regulatory efficacy, while students remaining in profiles showing stress reported lower levels of self-regulatory efficacy. Additionally, transitioning to a more maladaptive profile within the school year was related to lower self-regulatory efficacy. This study identified four different profiles among primary school students based on their self-regulatory efficacy sources: Highly positive , Average , Stressed , and Highly positive but stressed . Most students showed a positive combination of self-regulatory efficacy sources, but some students' profiles were more maladaptive, characterized by relatively high levels of stress. While most of the students remained in their initial profile during the school year, some transitions into maladaptive profiles did occur. These stabilities and transitions, in general, predicted students' self-regulatory efficacy, so that students showing more positive and stable profiles reported higher self-regulatory efficacy, whereas students belonging or transitioning to more stressed profiles reported lower self-regulatory efficacy. These findings suggest that experiencing stress may be harmful for student's self-efficacy, even when they otherwise have positive bases (that is, sources) for self-efficacy. • Various patterns of self-regulatory efficacy sources were identified. • Some students showed a mix of adaptive and maladaptive sources. • The profiles were highly stable, but some unfavorable transitions still occurred. • Maladaptive transitions between profiles predicted lower self-regulatory efficacy.

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 120
Åbo Akademi University (FI), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Eastern Finland (FI), University of Potsdam (DE), Finland University (FI), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Academy of Finland, Opetushallitus, Pohjois-Karjalan Rahasto, Kulttuurin ja Yhteiskunnan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.