The process of co-creation in educational services: insights from interviewing co-creative actors in higher education

Purpose This study develops a comprehensive understanding of the co-creation (CC) process in educational services. The specific context is higher education (HE), a vital sector within the domain of educational services. Design/methodology/approach We draw insights from those directly participating in CC within HE courses and programs. A grounded theory approach is employed, with data collected from interviews and focus groups. In total, 70 students, professors, tutors and support staff shared their practices in, and reflections on, CC. Our data coding was subjected to inter-coder reliability checking. Findings Key antecedents of CC are individual competence, tangible and intangible organizational support and technology readiness, with motivation, personal characteristics and activity design moderating the relationship between antecedents and CC. Outcomes of CC are shown to be positive (e.g. satisfaction), negative (e.g. co-destruction) or a positive/negative mix. Alignment, timing and interventions prove to be key moderators of the relationship between CC and its outcomes. We also highlight three features and four building blocks of CC, as well as inner and meta feedback loops in the CC process. Originality/value Drawing on the insights afforded by our interviewees, we derive the comprehensive Co-Creation in Educational Services (CCES) framework. CCES encapsulates antecedents, consequences, moderators and feedback to provide an understanding of how distinct aspects of CC interconnect. For the educational setting, CCES also contextualizes the established CC building blocks as conversation, autonomy, reflection and transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-04-2024-0100
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The process of co-creation in educational services: insights from interviewing co-creative actors in higher education

Artamonova Alyona Yu., Mark Uncles, Zixi Jiang
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
Service and Product Innovation
article

The process of co-creation in educational services: insights from interviewing co-creative actors in higher education

Artamonova Alyona Yu., Mark Uncles, Zixi Jiang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study develops a comprehensive understanding of the co-creation (CC) process in educational services. The specific context is higher education (HE), a vital sector within the domain of educational services. Design/methodology/approach We draw insights from those directly participating in CC within HE courses and programs. A grounded theory approach is employed, with data collected from interviews and focus groups. In total, 70 students, professors, tutors and support staff shared their practices in, and reflections on, CC. Our data coding was subjected to inter-coder reliability checking. Findings Key antecedents of CC are individual competence, tangible and intangible organizational support and technology readiness, with motivation, personal characteristics and activity design moderating the relationship between antecedents and CC. Outcomes of CC are shown to be positive (e.g. satisfaction), negative (e.g. co-destruction) or a positive/negative mix. Alignment, timing and interventions prove to be key moderators of the relationship between CC and its outcomes. We also highlight three features and four building blocks of CC, as well as inner and meta feedback loops in the CC process. Originality/value Drawing on the insights afforded by our interviewees, we derive the comprehensive Co-Creation in Educational Services (CCES) framework. CCES encapsulates antecedents, consequences, moderators and feedback to provide an understanding of how distinct aspects of CC interconnect. For the educational setting, CCES also contextualizes the established CC building blocks as conversation, autonomy, reflection and transparency.

Journal of Service Theory and PracticeVol. 35(3)
The University of Western Australia (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Service and Product Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The process of co-creation in educational services: insights from interviewing co-creative actors in higher education — Artamonova Alyona Yu., Mark Uncles, et al. · Journal of Service Theory and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS