Multimodal machine learning for deception detection using behavioral and physiological data

Deception detection is crucial in domains like national security, privacy, judiciary, and courtroom trials. Differentiating truth from lies is inherently challenging due to many complex, diversified behavioural, physiological and cognitive aspects. Traditional lie detector tests (polygraphs) have been widely used but remain controversial due to scientific, ethical, and practical concerns. With advancements in machine learning, deception detection can be automated. However, existing secondary datasets are limited-they are small, unimodal, and predominantly based on non-Indian populations. To address these gaps, we present CogniModal-D, a primary real-world multimodal dataset for deception detection, specifically targeting the Indian population. It spans seven modalities-electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), electrooculography (EOG), eye-gaze, galvanic skin response (GSR), audio, and video-collected from over 100 subjects. The data was gathered through tasks focused on social relationships and controlled mock crime interrogations. Our multimodal AI-based score-level fusion approach integrates diverse verbal and nonverbal cues, significantly improving deception detection accuracy compared to unimodal methods. Performance improvements of up to 15% were observed in mock crime and best friend scenarios with multimodal fusion. Notably, behavioural modalities (audio, video, gaze, GSR) proved more robust than neurophysiological ones (EEG, ECG, EOG).The study demonstrates that multimodal features offer superior discriminatory power in deception detection. These insights highlight the pivotal role of integrating multiple modalities to develop robust, scalable, and advanced deception detection systems in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92399-6
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal machine learning for deception detection using behavioral and physiological data

Aditya Desai, S Kunder, Rahee Walambe, Vaibhav Tasgaonkar et al.
12 citations
Scientific Reports
Deception detection and forensic psychology
26.82
article

Multimodal machine learning for deception detection using behavioral and physiological data

Aditya Desai, S Kunder, Rahee Walambe, Vaibhav Tasgaonkar, Harsh Maheshwari, Ketan Kotecha, Priyanka Jain, Aditya Deshpande, Bhavya Shah, Yoginii Waykole, N. K. Jain, Aadith Sukumar, Gargi Joshi, Shubhashi Gupta, Akanksha Subudhi, Akshay Kushawaha, Abhijit Das
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Deception detection is crucial in domains like national security, privacy, judiciary, and courtroom trials. Differentiating truth from lies is inherently challenging due to many complex, diversified behavioural, physiological and cognitive aspects. Traditional lie detector tests (polygraphs) have been widely used but remain controversial due to scientific, ethical, and practical concerns. With advancements in machine learning, deception detection can be automated. However, existing secondary datasets are limited-they are small, unimodal, and predominantly based on non-Indian populations. To address these gaps, we present CogniModal-D, a primary real-world multimodal dataset for deception detection, specifically targeting the Indian population. It spans seven modalities-electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), electrooculography (EOG), eye-gaze, galvanic skin response (GSR), audio, and video-collected from over 100 subjects. The data was gathered through tasks focused on social relationships and controlled mock crime interrogations. Our multimodal AI-based score-level fusion approach integrates diverse verbal and nonverbal cues, significantly improving deception detection accuracy compared to unimodal methods. Performance improvements of up to 15% were observed in mock crime and best friend scenarios with multimodal fusion. Notably, behavioural modalities (audio, video, gaze, GSR) proved more robust than neurophysiological ones (EEG, ECG, EOG).The study demonstrates that multimodal features offer superior discriminatory power in deception detection. These insights highlight the pivotal role of integrating multiple modalities to develop robust, scalable, and advanced deception detection systems in the future.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (IN), Symbiosis International University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
26.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.