Qualitative and quantitative analysis of ultra-efficiency projects: Commonalities, differences, and lessons learned

Industrial companies must become more sustainable and environmentally friendly to cope with rising energy and resource costs and regulatory requirements. One approach achieving these goals is the concept of ultra-efficiency, which has been developed and promoted by Fraunhofer in recent years. In many cases, measures to increase sustainability are more effective when neighboring companies work together than when they act individually. This is why the concept of ultra-efficiency has been extended from a single factory to multiple factories in industrial zones and, more recently, to agriculture in mixed-use urban districts. Understanding the benefits and identifying barriers and best practices for fostering such collaboration is important for translating scientific concepts into practice. Therefore, three completed projects are selected and qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in terms of their similarities and differences. Based on the analyses, a list of eight lessons is highlighted to assist in its quest for greater sustainability: Project complexity increases with diverse stakeholders. Public engagement and demonstrators are key to communication. A strong lead entity is essential early on. Decision maker engagement, clear benefits, data sharing, and independent operator models are key to achieving viable synergies. Long-term planning and infrastructure investment are essential to achieving sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Systems
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.1524221
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of ultra-efficiency projects: Commonalities, differences, and lessons learned

Patrick Balve, Jan-Niklas Gerdes, Joachim Lentes, Michael Hertwig et al.
3 citations
Journal of Energy Systems
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
6.68
article

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of ultra-efficiency projects: Commonalities, differences, and lessons learned

Patrick Balve, Jan-Niklas Gerdes, Joachim Lentes, Michael Hertwig, David Koch, Markus Kröll
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Industrial companies must become more sustainable and environmentally friendly to cope with rising energy and resource costs and regulatory requirements. One approach achieving these goals is the concept of ultra-efficiency, which has been developed and promoted by Fraunhofer in recent years. In many cases, measures to increase sustainability are more effective when neighboring companies work together than when they act individually. This is why the concept of ultra-efficiency has been extended from a single factory to multiple factories in industrial zones and, more recently, to agriculture in mixed-use urban districts. Understanding the benefits and identifying barriers and best practices for fostering such collaboration is important for translating scientific concepts into practice. Therefore, three completed projects are selected and qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in terms of their similarities and differences. Based on the analyses, a list of eight lessons is highlighted to assist in its quest for greater sustainability: Project complexity increases with diverse stakeholders. Public engagement and demonstrators are key to communication. A strong lead entity is essential early on. Decision maker engagement, clear benefits, data sharing, and independent operator models are key to achieving viable synergies. Long-term planning and infrastructure investment are essential to achieving sustainability goals.

Journal of Energy SystemsVol. 9(1)
Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering (DE), Heilbronn University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.