Cloacina’s Office: Pope’s <i>Temple of Fame</i> and the Ripples of Chaucerian Obscenity

ABSTRACT This article examines ideas of obscenity in Chaucer by considering his reception and afterlife in eighteenth-century literature. It focuses on Aesop at the Bear-Garden (1715), a scatological satire of Alexander Pope’s Temple of Fame (1715) that sought to humiliate Pope on two fronts: by suggesting that he was indebted not to Chaucer but to the more contemporary Hudibras; and by turning the Temple into a public lavatory. The article argues that attitudes towards Chaucer in eighteenth-century poetry were often motivated by a desire to rescue the poet from a double charge of “rude speech”: on the one hand, linguistic impenetrability, and, on the other, coarse vulgarity. In this context, we might read Aesop at the Bear-Garden as an example of a work that introduces obscenity into Chaucer instead of sanitizing him for more sensitive readers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Chaucer Review
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/chaucerrev.60.2.0184
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cloacina’s Office: Pope’s Temple of Fame and the Ripples of Chaucerian Obscenity

Lotte Reinbold
The Chaucer Review
Medieval Literature and History
article

Cloacina’s Office: Pope’s Temple of Fame and the Ripples of Chaucerian Obscenity

Lotte Reinbold
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines ideas of obscenity in Chaucer by considering his reception and afterlife in eighteenth-century literature. It focuses on Aesop at the Bear-Garden (1715), a scatological satire of Alexander Pope’s Temple of Fame (1715) that sought to humiliate Pope on two fronts: by suggesting that he was indebted not to Chaucer but to the more contemporary Hudibras; and by turning the Temple into a public lavatory. The article argues that attitudes towards Chaucer in eighteenth-century poetry were often motivated by a desire to rescue the poet from a double charge of “rude speech”: on the one hand, linguistic impenetrability, and, on the other, coarse vulgarity. In this context, we might read Aesop at the Bear-Garden as an example of a work that introduces obscenity into Chaucer instead of sanitizing him for more sensitive readers.

The Chaucer ReviewVol. 60(2)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.