Obscenity in Three English Lives of Geoffrey Chaucer, 1700–1803

ABSTRACT Charges of obscenity against the works of Geoffrey Chaucer have circulated throughout the past century or so, but the topic does not appear to have been of much concern in accounts of his life produced in English in earlier centuries. Seventeen accounts of Chaucer’s life were produced in English between 1532 and 1815, but only those by John Dryden (in Fables Ancient and Modern, 1700), Thomas Warton (in The History of English Poetry, 1774), and William Godwin (Life of Geoffrey Chaucer, 1803) discuss obscenity. This article argues that, despite the fact that all three writers go to some lengths to excuse or dismiss Chaucer’s obscenity, the popularity and influence of their accounts of Chaucer’s life have likely contributed to the preoccupation with Chaucerian obscenity seen in later centuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Chaucer Review
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/chaucerrev.60.2.0203
Primary Topic
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obscenity in Three English Lives of Geoffrey Chaucer, 1700–1803

Simone Celine Marshall
The Chaucer Review
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
article

Obscenity in Three English Lives of Geoffrey Chaucer, 1700–1803

Simone Celine Marshall
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Charges of obscenity against the works of Geoffrey Chaucer have circulated throughout the past century or so, but the topic does not appear to have been of much concern in accounts of his life produced in English in earlier centuries. Seventeen accounts of Chaucer’s life were produced in English between 1532 and 1815, but only those by John Dryden (in Fables Ancient and Modern, 1700), Thomas Warton (in The History of English Poetry, 1774), and William Godwin (Life of Geoffrey Chaucer, 1803) discuss obscenity. This article argues that, despite the fact that all three writers go to some lengths to excuse or dismiss Chaucer’s obscenity, the popularity and influence of their accounts of Chaucer’s life have likely contributed to the preoccupation with Chaucerian obscenity seen in later centuries.

The Chaucer ReviewVol. 60(2)
University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.