Exploring the nonlinear impact of emotional work demands and work passion on job satisfaction

Purpose We investigate the nonlinear relationship between emotional work demands (EWDs) and job satisfaction across different levels of work passion. Design/methodology/approach We analyzed data from 267 practicing nurses at a large USA hospital, collected over three distinct time points using polynomial analysis. Findings Results reveal an inverted U-shaped relationship between EWDs and job satisfaction, with satisfaction peaking at moderate levels of EWDs. This pattern applies to individuals with lower work passion. For high-passion individuals, findings indicate a more complex pattern characterized by increased satisfaction at moderate-to-high EWDs and a marginally significant decrease at low-to-moderate EWDs. Practical implications For high-passion employees, organizations should assign higher EWDs strategically while ensuring support during lower-demand periods. For low-passion employees, maintaining moderate demands is optimal. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating work passion assessments in personnel selection and work design optimization. Originality/value This study challenges the often-assumed linear relationship between increased work demands and job satisfaction. By integrating job demands-resources and activation theories, we highlight unique mechanisms through which work passion shapes demand appraisal and response in emotionally demanding contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-01-2024-0017
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the nonlinear impact of emotional work demands and work passion on job satisfaction

Yufan Deng, Ilias Kapoutsis, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Antonia Lampaki et al.
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Exploring the nonlinear impact of emotional work demands and work passion on job satisfaction

Yufan Deng, Ilias Kapoutsis, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Antonia Lampaki, Marsha Hartline, Patricia Ann Kenney
article en

Abstract

Purpose We investigate the nonlinear relationship between emotional work demands (EWDs) and job satisfaction across different levels of work passion. Design/methodology/approach We analyzed data from 267 practicing nurses at a large USA hospital, collected over three distinct time points using polynomial analysis. Findings Results reveal an inverted U-shaped relationship between EWDs and job satisfaction, with satisfaction peaking at moderate levels of EWDs. This pattern applies to individuals with lower work passion. For high-passion individuals, findings indicate a more complex pattern characterized by increased satisfaction at moderate-to-high EWDs and a marginally significant decrease at low-to-moderate EWDs. Practical implications For high-passion employees, organizations should assign higher EWDs strategically while ensuring support during lower-demand periods. For low-passion employees, maintaining moderate demands is optimal. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating work passion assessments in personnel selection and work design optimization. Originality/value This study challenges the often-assumed linear relationship between increased work demands and job satisfaction. By integrating job demands-resources and activation theories, we highlight unique mechanisms through which work passion shapes demand appraisal and response in emotionally demanding contexts.

Journal of Managerial PsychologyVol. 40(7)
Florida State University (US), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), The American College of Greece (GR), Tallahassee Memorial HealthCare (US), Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.