Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Estimating a Continuous Form of the Soil Water Retention Curve From Basic Soil Properties

Abstract This paper presents a novel physics‐informed neural network (PINN) approach for developing pedotransfer functions (PTFs) to predict continuous soil water retention curves (SWRCs) based on soil textural fractions, organic carbon content, and bulk density. In contrast to conventional parametric PTFs developed for specific SWRC models, the PINN learns a non‐specific form of the SWRC from both measurements and physical constraints imposed during the training process. This approach allows the estimated SWRC to maintain its physical integrity from saturation to oven‐dry conditions, even in scenarios with sparse data. The new approach is particularly effective for tackling the challenges encountered in developing PTFs on large SWRC data sets, which often have an imbalance toward the wet‐end () and include numerous samples with limited and unevenly distributed measurements, many of which do not meet the requirements to fit traditional SWRC models. We compared the performance of the PINN with that of a conventional physics‐agnostic neural network using a data set of 4,200 soil samples. While both networks performed similarly at the wet‐end where data are abundant, with RMSE values of around 0.041 m 3 m −3 , the PINN excelled at the dry‐end () where data are sparse and unevenly distributed, achieving a normalized RMSE of 0.172 (RMSE = 0.0045 m 3 m −3 ) compared to a normalized RMSE of 0.522 (RMSE = 0.0136 m 3 m −3 ) for the conventional neural network. The SWRC derived from the PINN is differentiable with respect to matric potential, making it well‐suited for integration into models of water flow in the unsaturated zone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr038149
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Estimating a Continuous Form of the Soil Water Retention Curve From Basic Soil Properties

Trine Nørgaard, Markus Tuller, Emmanuel Arthur, Amélie Beucher et al.
19 citations
Water Resources Research
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
18.11
article

Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Estimating a Continuous Form of the Soil Water Retention Curve From Basic Soil Properties

Trine Nørgaard, Markus Tuller, Emmanuel Arthur, Amélie Beucher, Morteza Sadeghi, Charles Pesch, Lis Wollesen de Jonge, Per Møldrup, Mogens Humlekrog Greve, Bo Vangsø Iversen, Sarem Norouzi, Marzieh Zaresourmanabad
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a novel physics‐informed neural network (PINN) approach for developing pedotransfer functions (PTFs) to predict continuous soil water retention curves (SWRCs) based on soil textural fractions, organic carbon content, and bulk density. In contrast to conventional parametric PTFs developed for specific SWRC models, the PINN learns a non‐specific form of the SWRC from both measurements and physical constraints imposed during the training process. This approach allows the estimated SWRC to maintain its physical integrity from saturation to oven‐dry conditions, even in scenarios with sparse data. The new approach is particularly effective for tackling the challenges encountered in developing PTFs on large SWRC data sets, which often have an imbalance toward the wet‐end () and include numerous samples with limited and unevenly distributed measurements, many of which do not meet the requirements to fit traditional SWRC models. We compared the performance of the PINN with that of a conventional physics‐agnostic neural network using a data set of 4,200 soil samples. While both networks performed similarly at the wet‐end where data are abundant, with RMSE values of around 0.041 m 3 m −3 , the PINN excelled at the dry‐end () where data are sparse and unevenly distributed, achieving a normalized RMSE of 0.172 (RMSE = 0.0045 m 3 m −3 ) compared to a normalized RMSE of 0.522 (RMSE = 0.0136 m 3 m −3 ) for the conventional neural network. The SWRC derived from the PINN is differentiable with respect to matric potential, making it well‐suited for integration into models of water flow in the unsaturated zone.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(3)
University of Arizona (US), Aarhus University (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
HORIZON EUROPE Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
18.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.