Icons versus tughra: Eremia Chʻelebi Kʻēōmiwrchean’s (1637–1695) textual passage on popular Muslim religious practices

Armenian polemical literature with Muslims from the early modern Ottoman context is very scarce. Unlike in Safavid Persia, public debates were not encouraged in the Ottoman Empire. Official polemical treatises from the Armenian milieu are lacking; little has survived in the historiographies, neo-martyrological accounts, and poetry about how Miaphysite (non-Chalcedonian) Apostolic Armenians positioned themselves within the cohabitation system of Ottoman society. Even less has survived in Armenian sources about popular Muslim religious practices. Therefore, a brief account of this matter provided by the 17th c. Armenian Constantinopolitan historiographer Eremia Kʻēōmiwrchean acquires great importance. The present article aims to explore the information provided by Eremia on popular Muslim religious practices, not only because it is a rare material preserved in the Armenian sources but, most importantly, because it reveals the topics of religious debates between Christians and Ottoman Muslims in everyday life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Written Monuments of the Orient
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55512/wmo635222
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Icons versus tughra: Eremia Chʻelebi Kʻēōmiwrchean’s (1637–1695) textual passage on popular Muslim religious practices

Anna Ohanjanyan
Written Monuments of the Orient
Islamic Studies and History
article

Icons versus tughra: Eremia Chʻelebi Kʻēōmiwrchean’s (1637–1695) textual passage on popular Muslim religious practices

Anna Ohanjanyan
article en

Abstract

Armenian polemical literature with Muslims from the early modern Ottoman context is very scarce. Unlike in Safavid Persia, public debates were not encouraged in the Ottoman Empire. Official polemical treatises from the Armenian milieu are lacking; little has survived in the historiographies, neo-martyrological accounts, and poetry about how Miaphysite (non-Chalcedonian) Apostolic Armenians positioned themselves within the cohabitation system of Ottoman society. Even less has survived in Armenian sources about popular Muslim religious practices. Therefore, a brief account of this matter provided by the 17th c. Armenian Constantinopolitan historiographer Eremia Kʻēōmiwrchean acquires great importance. The present article aims to explore the information provided by Eremia on popular Muslim religious practices, not only because it is a rare material preserved in the Armenian sources but, most importantly, because it reveals the topics of religious debates between Christians and Ottoman Muslims in everyday life.

Written Monuments of the OrientVol. 10(2)
Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute Foundation (AM), Matenadaran (AM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Icons versus tughra: Eremia Chʻelebi Kʻēōmiwrchean’s (1637–1695) textual passage on popular Muslim religious practices — Anna Ohanjanyan · Written Monuments of the Orient (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS